Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28785592›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2017

Current Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods and Their Implications to Point-of-Care Diagnostics.

Nasir Ali, Rita de Cássia Pontello Rampazzo, Alexandre Dias Tavares Costa, Marco Aurelio Krieger

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 163 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
163citing papers in PubMed
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

163 citing papers in PubMed, 354 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Detection ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Towards deployable CRISPR-based nucleic acid detection.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Isolation of RNA for RNA Sequencing in Ustilago maydis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nasir AliDepartamento de Engenharia de Bioprocessos e Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Rita de Cássia Pontello RampazzoInstituto de Biologia Molecular do Paraná (IBMP), Fiocruz, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Alexandre Dias Tavares CostaInstituto de Biologia Molecular do Paraná (IBMP), Fiocruz, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8434-2152
Marco Aurelio KriegerDepartamento de Engenharia de Bioprocessos e Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Instituto de Biologia Molecular do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleic acid extraction (NAE) plays a vital role in molecular biology as the primary step for many downstream applications. Many modifications have been introduced to the original 1869 method. Modern processes are categorized into chemical or mechanical, each with peculiarities that influence their use, especially in point-of-care diagnostics (POC-Dx). POC-Dx is a new approach aiming to replace sophisticated analytical machinery with microanalytical systems, able to be used near the patient, at the

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques and ProceduresPoint-of-Care SystemsHumansMicrotechnologyNucleic AcidsSolid Phase ExtractionNucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID28785592
PMCPMC5529626
OpenAlexW2735156098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.