Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28785482›Full record

ReviewJournal of ophthalmology2017

Vitreous Substitutes: Old and New Materials in Vitreoretinal Surgery.

Camilla Alovisi, Claudio Panico, Ugo de Sanctis, Chiara M Eandi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Foldable capsular vitreous body indications, complications, and outcomes: a systematic review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Application of Silicone in Ophthalmology: A Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Advances in Vitreoretinal Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Evaluation of Foldable Capsular Vitreous Body Implantation Surgery.International journal of general medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Camilla AlovisiEye Trauma Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Turin Eye Hospital, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8170-9465
Claudio PanicoEye Trauma Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Turin Eye Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Ugo de SanctisDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2852-305X
Chiara M EandiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent developments in vitreoretinal surgery have increased the need for suitable vitreous substitutes. A successful substitute should maintain all the physical and biochemical properties of the original vitreous, be easy to manipulate, and be long lasting. Substitutes can be gaseous or liquid, both of which have associated advantages and disadvantages related to their physical properties and use. Furthermore, new surgical techniques with smaller vitreoretinal instruments have driven the use of more viscous substitutes. In this review, we analyze and discuss the most frequently used vitreous substitutes and look ahead to future alternatives. We classify these compounds based on their composition and structure, discuss their clinical use with respect to their associated advantages and disadvantages, and analyze how new vitreoretinal surgical techniques have modified their use.

Identifiers

PMID28785482
PMCPMC5530429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.