Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28785465›Full record

ArticleCardiac failure review2016

The Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Heart Failure.

Mark A Peterzan, Oliver J Rider, Lisa J Anderson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiac failure review, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Diagnostic Tests for Stage B Heart Failure.Current cardiology reports · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. 30-minute CMR for common clinical indications: a Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance white paper.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark A PeterzanCardiology Clinical Academic GroupSt George's Hospital, London, UK.
Oliver J RiderUniversity of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research,John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Lisa J AndersonCardiology Clinical Academic GroupSt George's Hospital, London, UK.
John Radcliffe Hospital · GBSt George's Hospital · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/15/80/31803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular imaging is key for the assessment of patients with heart failure. Today, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging plays an established role in the assessment of patients with suspected and confirmed heart failure syndromes, in particular identifying aetiology. Its role in informing prognosis and guiding decisions around therapy are evolving. Key strengths include its accuracy; reproducibility; unrestricted field of view; lack of radiation; multiple abilities to characterise myocardial tissue, thrombus and scar; as well as unparalleled assessment of left and right ventricular volumes. T2* has an established role in the assessment and follow-up of iron overload cardiomyopathy and a role for T1 in specific therapies for cardiac amyloid and Anderson-Fabry disease is emerging.

Indexed as

cardiomyopathycardio-oncologyCardiovascular magnetic resonancedelayed enhancementheart failurelate gadolinium enhancementmyocarditisprognosisT1 mappingT2*

Identifiers

PMID28785465
PMCPMC5490982
OpenAlexW2590571954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.