ArticleCardiac failure review2015
Assessment of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Doppler Echocardiography.
Article in Cardiac failure review, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A pilot study to explore patterns and predictors of delayed kidney decline after cardiopulmonary bypass.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Determining whether LV filling time contributes to HF symptoms in different widths of QRS in LBBB patients: A clinical study.Global cardiology science & practice · 2024Article
- Left Ventricular Function in the Initial Period After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Swine.Neurocritical care · 2022Article
- A Review of the Role of Transthoracic and Transesophageal Echocardiography, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Cardioembolic Stroke.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022Review
- Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes-Progress and Perspectives.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diastole is an essential part of the cardiac cycle, during which significant changes in myocardial function, ion and energy transfer, as well as coronary flow, occur. In contrast to systole, diastole consists of four phases, each of which has its distinguishing function and events. However, the four phases are inter-related with events in early diastole correlating with those in late diastole and those occurring during the isovolumic relaxation time predicting both. The complexity of diastolic phases is reflected in the ways by which diastolic function is assessed. While intra-cardiac flow velocities, into and out of the atria, are measured by pulsed-wave Doppler, those of wall motion are assessed by M-mode, myocardial Doppler velocities or, recently, speckle tracking technique. Optimum integration of various aspects of diastolic function should always be considered in order to obtain an accurate comprehensive assessment, bearing in mind factors that normally affect it, for example age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.