ArticleCardiac failure review2015
Left Ventricular Assist Devices in the Management of Heart Failure.
Article in Cardiac failure review, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolic Consequences of Advanced Chronic Heart Failure and its Modification by Implantation of a Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- CoronaVac, BNT162b2 and heterologous COVID-19 vaccine outcomes in patients with ventricular assist device.The International journal of artificial organs · 2023Article
- Characteristics and Outcomes of COVID-19 in Patients on Left Ventricular Assist Device Support.Circulation. Heart failure · 2021Article
- The Impact of Obesity on Left Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020Article
- Left Ventricular Assist Device Support Complicates the Exercise Physiology of Oxygen Transport and Uptake in Heart Failure.Cardiac failure review · 2019Review
- CSI position statement on management of heart failure in India.Indian heart journal · 2018Review
- Retrospective Evaluation of Bayesian Risk Models of LVAD Mortality at a Single Implant Center.Frontiers in medicine · 2018Article
- Virtual reality-guided left ventricular assist device implantation in pediatric patient: Valuable presurgical tool.Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical circulatory support has emerged as an important therapy for advanced heart failure, with more than 18,000 continuous flow devices implanted worldwide to date. These devices significantly improve survival and quality of life and should be considered in every patient with end-stage heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who has no other life-limiting diseases. All candidates for device implantation should undergo a thorough evaluation in order to identify those who could benefit from device implantation. Long-term management of ventricular assist device patients is challenging and requires knowledge of the characteristic complications with their unique clinical presentations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.