Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28785014›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Ensa controls S-phase length by modulating Treslin levels.

Sophie Charrasse, Aicha Gharbi-Ayachi, Andrew Burgess, Jorge Vera, Khaled Hached, Peggy Raynaud, Etienne Schwob, Thierry Lorca, Anna Castro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Coordinating DNA Replication and Mitosis through Ubiquitin/SUMO and CDK1.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sophie CharrasseUniversité de Montpellier, Centre de Recherche de Biologie Cellulaire de Montpellier, Equipe Labellisée 'Ligue Contre le Cancer', CNRS UMR 5237, 1919 Route de Mende, 34293, Montpellier cedex 5, France.
Aicha Gharbi-AyachiUniversité de Montpellier, Centre de Recherche de Biologie Cellulaire de Montpellier, Equipe Labellisée 'Ligue Contre le Cancer', CNRS UMR 5237, 1919 Route de Mende, 34293, Montpellier cedex 5, France.
Andrew BurgessThe Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4536-9226
Jorge VeraUniversité de Montpellier, Centre de Recherche de Biologie Cellulaire de Montpellier, Equipe Labellisée 'Ligue Contre le Cancer', CNRS UMR 5237, 1919 Route de Mende, 34293, Montpellier cedex 5, France.
Khaled HachedUniversité de Montpellier, Centre de Recherche de Biologie Cellulaire de Montpellier, Equipe Labellisée 'Ligue Contre le Cancer', CNRS UMR 5237, 1919 Route de Mende, 34293, Montpellier cedex 5, France.
Peggy RaynaudUniversité de Montpellier, Centre de Recherche de Biologie Cellulaire de Montpellier, Equipe Labellisée 'Ligue Contre le Cancer', CNRS UMR 5237, 1919 Route de Mende, 34293, Montpellier cedex 5, France.
Etienne SchwobInstitute of Molecular Genetics, CNRS UMR 5535, University of Montpellier, 1919 Route de Mende, 34293, Montpellier, France.
Thierry LorcaUniversité de Montpellier, Centre de Recherche de Biologie Cellulaire de Montpellier, Equipe Labellisée 'Ligue Contre le Cancer', CNRS UMR 5237, 1919 Route de Mende, 34293, Montpellier cedex 5, France. thierry.lorca@crbm.cnrs.fr.
Anna CastroUniversité de Montpellier, Centre de Recherche de Biologie Cellulaire de Montpellier, Equipe Labellisée 'Ligue Contre le Cancer', CNRS UMR 5237, 1919 Route de Mende, 34293, Montpellier cedex 5, France. anna.castro@crbm.cnrs.fr.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRGarvan Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Greatwall/Ensa/PP2A-B55 pathway is essential for controlling mitotic substrate phosphorylation and mitotic entry. Here, we investigate the effect of the knockdown of the Gwl substrate, Ensa, in human cells. Unexpectedly, Ensa knockdown promotes a dramatic extension of S phase associated with a lowered density of replication forks. Notably, Ensa depletion results in a decrease of Treslin levels, a pivotal protein for the firing of replication origins. Accordingly, the extended S phase in Ensa-depleted cells is completely rescued by the overexpression of Treslin. Our data herein reveal a new mechanism by which normal cells regulate S-phase duration by controlling the ubiquitin-proteasome degradation of Treslin in a Gwl/Ensa-dependent pathway.The Greatwall/Ensa/PP2A-B55 pathway controls mitotic substrate phosphorylation and mitotic entry. Here the authors show that cells regulate S phase duration by controlling the ubiquitin-proteasome degradation of Treslin in a Gwl/Ensa-dependent pathway.

Indexed as

S PhaseCell Cycle ProteinsCell DivisionHeLa CellsHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMitosisPeptidesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesCell Cycle ProteinsendosulfineIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMASTL protein, humanMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsPeptidesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesTICRR protein, human

Identifiers

PMID28785014
PMCPMC5547116
OpenAlexW2742113171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.