Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28784838›Full record

ArticleOccupational and environmental medicine2017

Childhood adversity, adult socioeconomic status and risk of work disability: a prospective cohort study.

Jaana I Halonen, Mika Kivimäki, Jussi Vahtera, Jaana Pentti, Marianna Virtanen, Jenni Ervasti, Tuula Oksanen, Tea Lallukka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Predictors of working days lost due to sickness absence and disability pension.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2021
    Article
  15. Work Participation among Women and Men in Sweden: A Register Study of 8.5 Million Individuals.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jaana I HalonenFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Mika KivimäkiFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Jussi VahteraDepartment of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Jaana PenttiFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Marianna VirtanenFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Jenni ErvastiFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Tuula OksanenFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Tea LallukkaFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine the combined effects of childhood adversities and low adult socioeconomic status (SES) on the risk of future work disability.

methodsIncluded were 34 384 employed Finnish Public Sector study participants who responded to questions about childhood adversities (none vs any adversity, eg, parental divorce or financial difficulties) in 2008, and whose adult SES in 2008 was available. We categorised exposure into four groups: neither (reference), childhood adversity only, low SES only or both. Participants were followed from 2009 until the first period of register-based work disability (sickness absence >9 days or disability pension) due to any cause, musculoskeletal or mental disorders; retirement; death or end of follow-up (December 2011). We ran Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for behavioural, health-related and work-related covariates, and calculated synergy indices for the combined effects.

resultsWhen compared with those with neither exposure, HR for work disability from any cause was increased among participants with childhood adversity, with low SES, and those with both exposures. The highest hazard was observed in those with both exposures: HR 2.53, 95% CI 2.29 to 2.79 for musculoskeletal disability, 1.55, 95% CI 1.36 to 1.78 for disability due to mental disorders and 1.29, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.39 for disability due to other reasons. The synergy indices did not indicate synergistic effects.

conclusionsThese findings indicate that childhood psychosocial adversity and low adult SES are additive risk factors for work disability.

Indexed as

EmploymentPersons with DisabilitiesSocial ClassAdultAge FactorsFamily RelationsFemaleFinlandFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMental DisordersMental HealthMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal DiseasesOccupational Diseaseschildhood adversitycohort studylife coursesocioeconomic statuswork disability

Identifiers

PMID28784838
PMCPMC5574408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.