ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017
Early history of Neanderthals and Denisovans.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A simple analytical model for Neanderthal disappearance due to genetic dilution by recurrent small-scale immigrations of modern humans.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Estimating allele frequencies, ancestry proportions and genotype likelihoods in the presence of mapping bias.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Semicircular canals shed light on bottleneck events in the evolution of the Neanderthal clade.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The Neanderthal niche space of Western Eurasia 145 ka to 30 ka ago.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Creating frames of reference for chert exploitation during the Late Pleistocene in Southwesternmost Iberia.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
- Oxytocin and vasotocin receptor variation and the evolution of human prosociality.Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2022Article
- Estimating divergence times from DNA sequences.Genetics · 2021Article
- An ecological niche shift for Neanderthal populations in Western Europe 70,000 years ago.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Reconstructing cranial evolution in an extinct hominin.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Thr92Ala polymorphism in the type 2 deiodinase gene: an evolutionary perspective.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2020Article
- Neanderthal-Denisovan ancestors interbred with a distantly related hominin.Science advances · 2020Article
- Disease transmission and introgression can explain the long-lasting contact zone of modern humans and Neanderthals.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Legofit: estimating population history from genetic data.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Complex Phenotypes: Mechanisms Underlying Variation in Human Stature.Current osteoporosis reports · 2019Review
- Morphology of the Denisovan phalanx closer to modern humans than to Neanderthals.Science advances · 2019Article
- Genetics, adaptation to environmental changes and archaic admixture in the pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus in Indigenous Australians.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2019Review
- Impact and Evolutionary Determinants of Neanderthal Introgression on Transcriptional and Post-Transcriptional Regulation.American journal of human genetics · 2019Article
- Mosaic dental morphology in a terminal Pleistocene hominin from Dushan Cave in southern China.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extensive DNA sequence data have made it possible to reconstruct human evolutionary history in unprecedented detail. We introduce a method to study the past several hundred thousand years. Our results show that (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.