Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28784713›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2017

Ocean (de)oxygenation from the Last Glacial Maximum to the twenty-first century: insights from Earth System models.

L Bopp, L Resplandy, A Untersee, P Le Mezo, M Kageyama

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Ocean ventilation and deoxygenation in a warming world: introduction and overview.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

L BoppLMD/IPSL, CNRS/ENS/Ecole Polytechnique/UPMC, Paris, France bopp@lmd.ens.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4732-4953
L ResplandyPrinceton University, Geosciences Department, Princeton Environmental Institute, Princeton, NJ, USA.
A UnterseeEcole Normale Supérieure, Département de Géosciences, Paris, France.
P Le MezoLSCE/IPSL, CNRS/CEA/ UVSQ, CE Saclay, Gif sur Yvette, France.
M KageyamaLSCE/IPSL, CNRS/CEA/ UVSQ, CE Saclay, Gif sur Yvette, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRLaboratoire de Géologie de l’École Normale Supérieure · FRPrinceton University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All Earth System models project a consistent decrease in the oxygen content of oceans for the coming decades because of ocean warming, reduced ventilation and increased stratification. But large uncertainties for these future projections of ocean deoxygenation remain for the subsurface tropical oceans where the major oxygen minimum zones are located. Here, we combine global warming projections, model-based estimates of natural short-term variability, as well as data and model estimates of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) ocean oxygenation to gain some insights into the major mechanisms of oxygenation changes across these different time scales. We show that the primary uncertainty on future ocean deoxygenation in the subsurface tropical oceans is in fact controlled by a robust compensation between decreasing oxygen saturation (O

Indexed as

Earth System modellingLast Glacial Maximum and future projectionsocean deoxygenation

Identifiers

PMID28784713
PMCPMC5559418
OpenAlexW2744214237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.