Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28784312›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2017

Neoadjuvant cisplatin and fluorouracil versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine followed by resection in patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma (UK MRC OE05): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.

Derek Alderson, David Cunningham, Matthew Nankivell, Jane M Blazeby, S Michael Griffin, Adrian Crellin, Heike I Grabsch, Rupert Langer, Susan Pritchard, Alicia Okines and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
25.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 220 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Assessing the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy on quality of life during treatment in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Evaluation of tumor regression by neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens for esophageal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2023
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The density of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes in oesophago-gastric cancer varies with disease stage, geographical region and treatment: a post hoc analysis of nine phase III clinical trials.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Derek AldersonQueen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
David CunninghamThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: david.cunningham@rmh.nhs.uk.
Matthew NankivellMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK.
Jane M BlazebyCentre for Surgical Research, University of Bristol, Bristol and University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
S Michael GriffinThe Northern Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Adrian CrellinLeeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Heike I GrabschLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Rupert LangerUniversity of Bern, Bern, Germany.
Susan PritchardUniversity Hospital South Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Alicia OkinesThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Richard KrysztopikRoyal United Hospital, Bath, UK.
Fareeda CoxonThe Northern Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Joyce ThompsonBirmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Stephen FalkBristol and University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Clare RobbSt George's, University of London, London, UK.
Sally StenningMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK.
Ruth E LangleyMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK.
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Victoria Infirmary · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBHeartlands Hospital · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBMaastricht University · NLMedical Research Council · GBQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBRoyal United Hospital · GBSt George's, University of London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 12373Cancer Research UK 16251Cancer Research UK C1495/A3005Cancer Research UK C26441/A16251Medical Research Council MC_U122861327Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/28Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery improves survival compared with surgery alone for patients with oesophageal cancer. The OE05 trial assessed whether increasing the duration and intensity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy further improved survival compared with the current standard regimen.

methodsOE05 was an open-label, phase 3, randomised clinical trial. Patients with surgically resectable oesophageal adenocarcinoma classified as stage cT1N1, cT2N1, cT3N0/N1, or cT4N0/N1 were recruited from 72 UK hospitals. Eligibility criteria included WHO performance status 0 or 1, adequate respiratory, cardiac, and liver function, white blood cell count at least 3 × 10

findingsBetween Jan 13, 2005, and Oct 31, 2011, 897 patients were recruited and 451 were assigned to the CF group and 446 to the ECX group. By Nov 14, 2016, 327 (73%) of 451 patients in the CF group and 302 (68%) of 446 in the ECX group had died. Median survival was 23·4 months (95% CI 20·6-26·3) with CF and 26·1 months (22·5-29·7) with ECX (hazard ratio 0·90 (95% CI 0·77-1·05, p=0·19). No unexpected chemotherapy toxicity was seen, and neutropenia was the most commonly reported event (grade 3 or 4 neutropenia: 74 [17%] of 446 patients in the CF group vs 101 [23%] of 441 people in the ECX group). The proportions of patients with postoperative complications (224 [56%] of 398 people for whom data were available in the CF group and 233 [62%] of 374 in the ECX group; p=0·089) were similar between the two groups. One patient in the ECX group died of suspected treatment-related neutropenic sepsis.

interpretationFour cycles of neoadjuvant ECX compared with two cycles of CF did not increase survival, and cannot be considered standard of care. Our study involved a large number of centres and detailed protocol with comprehensive prospective assessment of health-related quality of life in a patient population confined to people with adenocarcinomas of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction (Siewert types 1 and 2). Alternative chemotherapy regimens and neoadjuvant chemoradiation are being investigated to improve outcomes for patients with oesophageal carcinoma.

fundingCancer Research UK and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London.

Indexed as

EsophagectomyAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCapecitabineCisplatinDrug Therapy, CombinationEpirubicinEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleFluorouracilHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntineoplastic AgentsCapecitabineCisplatinEpirubicinFluorouracil

Identifiers

PMID28784312
PMCPMC5585417
OpenAlexW2741953965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.