Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28784179›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychology2017

Testing the impact of a social skill training versus waiting list control group for the reduction of disruptive behaviors and stress among preschool children in child care: the study protocol for a cluster randomized trial.

Sylvana M Côté, Marie-Pier Larose, Marie Claude Geoffroy, Julie Laurin, Frank Vitaro, Richard E Tremblay, Isabelle Ouellet-Morin

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Storm Alex: acute stress responses in the pediatric population.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2022
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sylvana M CôtéUniversity de Montréal, 3050 Édouard-Montpetit, Montreal, H3T 1J7, Canada. sylvana.cote.1@umontreal.ca.
Marie-Pier LaroseUniversity de Montréal, 3050 Édouard-Montpetit, Montreal, H3T 1J7, Canada.
Marie Claude GeoffroyUniversity McGill, Montreal, Canada.
Julie LaurinUniversity de Montréal, 3050 Édouard-Montpetit, Montreal, H3T 1J7, Canada.
Frank VitaroUniversity de Montréal, 3050 Édouard-Montpetit, Montreal, H3T 1J7, Canada.
Richard E TremblayUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Isabelle Ouellet-MorinUniversity de Montréal, 3050 Édouard-Montpetit, Montreal, H3T 1J7, Canada.
Université de Montréal · CAMcGill University · CAUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost preschoolers growing up in western industrialized countries receive child care services (CCS) during the day, while their parents are at work. Meta-analytic data suggest that CCS represent a stressful experience for preschoolers. This may be because preschoolers have not yet developed the social skills necessary to cope with the new and rapidly fluctuating social contexts of CCS. We tested the effectiveness of a child care-based social skill training program aiming to improve children's social behaviors and reduce the stress they experience. METHOD AND

designWe used a cluster randomized control trial (cRCT) to compare children's social behaviors and stress levels in pre- and post-intervention according to whether they received a social skill training intervention or not. Nineteen (n = 19) public CCS (n = 362, 3-years-old preschoolers) of underprivileged neighborhoods (Montreal, Canada) were randomized to one of two conditions: 1) social skills training (n = 10 CCS); or 2) waiting list control group (n = 9 CCS). Educators in the intervention group conducted bi-weekly social skills training sessions over a period of 8 months. The intervention covered four topics: making social contacts, problem solving, emotional self-regulation, as well as emotional expression and recognition. Main outcome measures included preschoolers' disruptive (e.g. aggression, opposition, conflicts) and prosocial behaviors (e.g. sharing toys, helping another child), and stress levels assessed by salivary cortisol sampling at pre and post intervention assessments. Educators' practices will be tested as potential mediators of the expected changes in behaviors and neuroendocrine stress. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first cRCT to test the effectiveness of a child care based social skill training program on the reduction of disruptive behaviors and levels of stress. Significant challenges include the degree of adherence to the intervention protocol as well educators and preschoolers' turnover.

trial registrationCurrent clinical trial number is ISRCTN84339956 (Ongoing study, Retrospectively registered on March 2017) No amendment to initial protocol.

Indexed as

Child CareProblem BehaviorSocial BehaviorSocial SkillsWaiting ListsAdaptation, PsychologicalCanadaChild, PreschoolHumansParentsProspective StudiesChild care servicesCortisolInterventionPovertySocial developmentSocial skill training

Identifiers

PMID28784179
PMCPMC5545840
OpenAlexW2744109615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.