Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28784162›Full record

ArticleCell communication and signaling : CCS2017

Csk-homologous kinase (Chk) is an efficient inhibitor of Src-family kinases but a poor catalyst of phosphorylation of their C-terminal regulatory tyrosine.

Gahana Advani, Ya Chee Lim, Bruno Catimel, Daisy Sio Seng Lio, Nadia L Y Ng, Anderly C Chüeh, Mai Tran, Mohd Ishtiaq Anasir, Heather Verkade, Hong-Jian Zhu and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Novel CDKL5 targets identified in human iPSC-derived neurons.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Regulation, targets and functions of CSK.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  7. Regulation, targets and functions of CHK.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Gahana AdvaniDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Ya Chee LimDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Bruno CatimelWalter and Eliza Hall Institute for Medical Research and Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Daisy Sio Seng LioDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Nadia L Y NgDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Anderly C ChüehWalter and Eliza Hall Institute for Medical Research and Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Mai TranDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Mohd Ishtiaq AnasirDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Heather VerkadeDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Hong-Jian ZhuDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Benjamin E TurkDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Thomas E SmithgallDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ching-Seng AngBio21 Biotechnology and Molecular Science Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Michael GriffinDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Heung-Chin ChengDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia. heung@unimelb.edu.au.
University of Melbourne · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUUniversiti Brunei Darussalam · BNUniversity of Pittsburgh · USYale University · US

Funding

Modeling human phosphorylation networks through kinome-wide profilingR01GM104047 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI TURK, BENJAMIN E, YAFFE, MICHAEL B · 2013 to 2017
$2.4M
Structural Biology of HIV-1 Nef with Host Effectors and Small Molecule InhibitorsR01AI102724 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ALVARADO, JOHN JEFF, SMITHGALL, THOMAS E. · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI102724NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundC-terminal Src kinase (Csk) and Csk-homologous kinase (Chk) are the major endogenous inhibitors of Src-family kinases (SFKs). They employ two mechanisms to inhibit SFKs. First, they phosphorylate the C-terminal tail tyrosine which stabilizes SFKs in a closed inactive conformation by engaging the SH2 domain in cis. Second, they employ a non-catalytic inhibitory mechanism involving direct binding of Csk and Chk to the active forms of SFKs that is independent of phosphorylation of their C-terminal tail. Csk and Chk are co-expressed in many cell types. Contributions of the two mechanisms towards the inhibitory activity of Csk and Chk are not fully clear. Furthermore, the determinants in Csk and Chk governing their inhibition of SFKs by the non-catalytic inhibitory mechanism are yet to be defined.

methodsWe determined the contributions of the two mechanisms towards the inhibitory activity of Csk and Chk both in vitro and in transduced colorectal cancer cells. Specifically, we assayed the catalytic activities of Csk and Chk in phosphorylating a specific peptide substrate and a recombinant SFK member Src. We employed surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy to measure the kinetic parameters of binding of Csk, Chk and their mutants to a constitutively active mutant of the SFK member Hck. Finally, we determined the effects of expression of recombinant Chk on anchorage-independent growth and SFK catalytic activity in Chk-deficient colorectal cancer cells.

resultsOur results revealed Csk as a robust enzyme catalysing phosphorylation of the C-terminal tail tyrosine of SFKs but a weak non-catalytic inhibitor of SFKs. In contrast, Chk is a poor catalyst of SFK tail phosphorylation but binds SFKs with high affinity, enabling it to efficiently inhibit SFKs with the non-catalytic inhibitory mechanism both in vitro and in transduced colorectal cancer cells. Further analyses mapped some of the determinants governing this non-catalytic inhibitory mechanism of Chk to its kinase domain.

conclusionsSFKs are activated by different upstream signals to adopt multiple active conformations in cells. SFKs adopting these conformations can effectively be constrained by the two complementary inhibitory mechanisms of Csk and Chk. Furthermore, the lack of this non-catalytic inhibitory mechanism accounts for SFK overactivation in the Chk-deficient colorectal cancer cells.

Indexed as

Binding SitesCell Line, TumorHEK293 CellsHumansMutationPhosphorylationProtein BindingProtein DomainsProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProto-Oncogene Proteins pp60(c-src)TyrosineMATK protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins pp60(c-src)TyrosineCatalysis, colon cancerChkCskC-terminal Src kinaseSrc-family protein kinasesTumor suppressor

Identifiers

PMID28784162
PMCPMC5547543
OpenAlexW2743092628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.