Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28784122›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2017

Estimation of malaria parasite reservoir coverage using reactive case detection and active community fever screening from census data with rapid diagnostic tests in southern Zambia: a re-sampling approach.

Joshua Yukich, Adam Bennett, Rudy Yukich, Logan Stuck, Busiku Hamainza, Kafula Silumbe, Tom Smith, Nakul Chitnis, Richard W Steketee, Timothy Finn and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Joshua YukichCenter for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation (CAMRE), Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 70112, United States. jyukich@tulane.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6160-5295
Adam BennettGlobal Health Group, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Rudy YukichSensorstar Inc., Ellicott City, MD, United States.
Logan StuckCenter for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation (CAMRE), Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 70112, United States.
Busiku HamainzaNational Malaria Control Centre, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
Kafula SilumbeMalaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), PATH, Lusaka, Zambia.
Tom SmithSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, and University of Basel, Basel, CH, Switzerland.
Nakul ChitnisSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, and University of Basel, Basel, CH, Switzerland.
Richard W SteketeeMalaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), PATH, Lusaka, Zambia.
Timothy FinnCenter for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation (CAMRE), Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 70112, United States.
Thomas P EiseleCenter for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation (CAMRE), Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 70112, United States.
John M MillerMalaria Control and Elimination Partnership in Africa (MACEPA), PATH, Lusaka, Zambia.
Tulane University · USNational HIV/AIDS/STI/TB Council · ZMSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHMinistry of Health · ZMSensors (United States) · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

methodsIn areas where malaria transmission has been suppressed by vector control interventions many malaria control and elimination programmes are actively seeking new interventions to further reduce malaria prevalence, incidence and transmission. Malaria infection prevalence and incidence has been shown to cluster geographically, especially at lower transmission levels, and as such a reactive strategy is frequently used, by which index cases presenting to a passive surveillance system are used to target small areas for testing and treatment, reactive case detection (RCD), or focal drug administration (fDA). This study utilizes geo-located data from a census with parasitological testing with rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and treatment-seeking data collection conducted in southern Zambia to estimate the coverage of RCD or fDA in terms of the population and parasite reservoir as well as the operational requirements of such strategies, using a re-sampling algorithm developed exclusively for this purpose. This re-sampling algorithm allows for the specification of several parameters, such that different operational variants of these reactive strategies can be examined, including varying the search radius, screening for fever, or presumptive treatment (fDA).

resultsResults indicate that RCD, fDA and active fever screening followed by RCD, even with search radii over several hundered meters will only yield limited coverage of the RDT positive parasite reservoir during a short period. Long-term use of these strategies may increase this proportion. Reactive strategies detect a higher proportion of the reservoir of infections than random searches, but this effect appears to be greater in areas of low, but not moderate malaria prevalence in southern Zambia. DISCUSSION: Increases in the sensitivity of RDTs could also affect these results. The number of individuals and households that need to be searched increase rapidly, but approximately linearly with search radius.

conclusionsReactive strategies in southern Zambia yield improved identification of the parasite reservoir when targeted to areas with prevalence less than 10%. The operational requirements of delivering reactive strategies routinely are likely to prevent their uptake until prevalence falls far below this level.

Indexed as

Disease ReservoirsAntimalarialsDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFeverMalariaMass ScreeningPrevalenceZambiaAntimalarialsActive community fever screeningCase detectionFever screeningMalariaReactive case detectionResampling

Identifiers

PMID28784122
PMCPMC5547485
OpenAlexW2742317446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.