Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28784120›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

Willingness to pay and willingness to accept in a patient-centered blood pressure control study.

Julie Gleason-Comstock, Alicia Streater, Allen Goodman, James Janisse, Aaron Brody, LynnMarie Mango, Rachelle Dawood, Phillip Levy

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02069015 (Achieving Blood Pressure Control Through Enhanced Discharge), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02069015 nacompletednot on this map

Achieving Blood Pressure Control Through Enhanced Discharge

TypeinterventionalSponsorWayne State UniversityRan2013 to 2016Enrolled139ConditionsHypertensionArmsPatient education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Musings on Patient Willingness to Pay.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2021
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julie Gleason-ComstockDepartment of Family Medicine & Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, 3939 Woodward Ave, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA. jgleason@med.wayne.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2986-9060
Alicia StreaterCenter for Urban Studies, Wayne State University, 5700 Cass Ave, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
Allen GoodmanDepartment of Economics, Wayne State University, 656 W. Kirby St., 2074 FAB, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
James JanisseDepartment of Family Medicine & Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, 3939 Woodward Ave, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
Aaron BrodyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University, 4201 St. Antoine, UHC-6G, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
LynnMarie MangoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University, 4201 St. Antoine, UHC-6G, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
Rachelle DawoodDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University, 4201 St. Antoine, UHC-6G, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
Phillip LevyCardiovascular Research Institute, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, 421 E. Canfield St, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
Wayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElevated blood pressure is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and stroke but patients often discount recommended behavioral changes and prescribed medications. While effective interventions to promote adherence have been developed, cost-effectiveness from the patient's perspective, has not been well studied. The valuation of patient time and out of pocket expenses should be included while performing cost effectiveness evaluation. The Achieve BP study uses the contingent valuation method to assess willingness to accept (WTA) and willingness to pay (WTP) among patients with a history of uncontrolled blood pressure discharged from an urban emergency department and enrolled in a larger randomized controlled trial.

methodsWTA and WTP were assessed by asking patients a series of questions about time and travel costs and time value related to their study participation. A survey was conducted during the final study visit with patients to investigate the effectiveness of a kiosk-based educational intervention on blood pressure control. All study patients, regardless of study arm, received the same clinical protocol of commonly prescribed antihypertensive medication and met with research clinicians four times as part of the study procedures.

resultsThirty-eight patients were offered the opportunity to participate in the cost-effectiveness study and all completed the survey. Statistical comparisons revealed these 38 patients were similar in representation to the entire RCT study population. All 38 (100.0%) were African-American, with an average age of 49.1 years; 55.3% were male, 21.1% were married, 78.9% had a high school or higher education, and 44.7% were working. 55.9% did not have a primary care provider and 50.0% did not have health insurance. Time price linear regression analysis was performed to estimate predictors of WTA and WTP.

conclusionsWTP and WTA may generate different results, and the elasticities were proportional to the estimated coefficients, with WTP about twice as responsive as WTA. An additional feature for health services research was successful piloting in a clinical setting of a brief patient-centered cost effectiveness survey.

trial registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov . Registration Number NCT02069015 . Registered February 19, 2014 (Retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

Financing, PersonalAdultAgedAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargeRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAntihypertensive AgentsCost evaluationHypertensionPatient care and educationSurvey and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID28784120
PMCPMC5547517
OpenAlexW2742853780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.