Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28784111›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

A nonparametric Bayesian method of translating machine learning scores to probabilities in clinical decision support.

Brian Connolly, K Bretonnel Cohen, Daniel Santel, Ulya Bayram, John Pestian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Artificial Intelligence and Suicide Prevention: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Investigations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brian ConnollyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave., MLC 7024, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA.
K Bretonnel CohenComputational Bioscience Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA.
Daniel SantelDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave., MLC 7024, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA.
Ulya BayramDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave., MLC 7024, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA.
John PestianDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave., MLC 7024, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA. john.pestian@cchmc.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProbabilistic assessments of clinical care are essential for quality care. Yet, machine learning, which supports this care process has been limited to categorical results. To maximize its usefulness, it is important to find novel approaches that calibrate the ML output with a likelihood scale. Current state-of-the-art calibration methods are generally accurate and applicable to many ML models, but improved granularity and accuracy of such methods would increase the information available for clinical decision making. This novel non-parametric Bayesian approach is demonstrated on a variety of data sets, including simulated classifier outputs, biomedical data sets from the University of California, Irvine (UCI) Machine Learning Repository, and a clinical data set built to determine suicide risk from the language of emergency department patients.

resultsThe method is first demonstrated on support-vector machine (SVM) models, which generally produce well-behaved, well understood scores. The method produces calibrations that are comparable to the state-of-the-art Bayesian Binning in Quantiles (BBQ) method when the SVM models are able to effectively separate cases and controls. However, as the SVM models' ability to discriminate classes decreases, our approach yields more granular and dynamic calibrated probabilities comparing to the BBQ method. Improvements in granularity and range are even more dramatic when the discrimination between the classes is artificially degraded by replacing the SVM model with an ad hoc k-means classifier.

conclusionsThe method allows both clinicians and patients to have a more nuanced view of the output of an ML model, allowing better decision making. The method is demonstrated on simulated data, various biomedical data sets and a clinical data set, to which diverse ML methods are applied. Trivially extending the method to (non-ML) clinical scores is also discussed.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalMachine LearningAdolescentBayes TheoremCalibrationHumansStatistics, NonparametricSuicideSupport Vector MachineBayesianCalibrationMachine learningNonparametricStatistics

Identifiers

PMID28784111
PMCPMC5545857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.