Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28784106›Full record

SynthesisBMC nephrology2017

A comparison of early versus late initiation of renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Xiao-Mei Yang, Guo-Wei Tu, Ji-Li Zheng, Bo Shen, Guo-Guang Ma, Guang-Wei Hao, Jian Gao, Zhe Luo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC nephrology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05382598 (Early Versus Late Renal Replacement Therapy In Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Acute Kidney Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05382598 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Early Versus Late Renal Replacement Therapy In Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Acute Kidney Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlexandria UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled94ConditionsTiming of RRT in Mechanically Ventilated PatientsArmsRenal replacement therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiao-Mei YangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Guo-Wei TuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Ji-Li ZhengDepartment of Nursing, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Bo ShenDepartment of Nephrology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Guo-Guang MaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Guang-Wei HaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Jian GaoDepartment of Nutrition, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China. gao.jian@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Zhe LuoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China. luo.zhe@zs-hospital.sh.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo investigate the impact of timing the initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) on clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI), focusing on the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in this field.

methodsThe PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched between January 1, 1985, and June 30, 2016, to identify randomized trials that assessed the timing of initiation of RRT in patients with AKI.

resultsNine RCTs, with a total of 1636 patients, were enrolled in this meta-analysis. A pooled analysis of the studies indicated no mortality benefit with "early" RRT, with an RR of 0.98 (95% CI 0.78 to 1.23, P = 0.84). There was no significant difference in intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) or hospital LOS between the early and late RRT groups for survivors or nonsurvivors. Pooled analysis also demonstrated no significant change in renal function recovery (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.19, I2 = 59%), RRT dependence (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.37, I2 = 0%), duration of RRT (Mean difference 1.43, 95% CI -1.75 to 4.61, I2 = 78%), renal recovery time (Mean difference 0.73, 95% CI -2.09 to 3.56, I2 = 70%) or mechanical ventilation time (Mean difference - 0.95, 95% CI -3.54 to 1.64, I2 = 64%) between the early and late RRT groups. We found no significant differences in complications between the groups.

conclusionsOur meta-analysis revealed that the "early" initiation of RRT in critically ill patients did not result in reduced mortality. Pooled analysis of secondary outcomes also showed no significant difference between the early and late RRT groups. More well-designed and large-scale trials are expected to confirm the result of this meta-analysis.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessAcute Kidney InjuryHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRenal Replacement TherapyTime-to-TreatmentAcute kidney injuryRenal replacement therapyTiming

Identifiers

PMID28784106
PMCPMC5547509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.