Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28784083›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

Conclusive evidence for hexasomic inheritance in chrysanthemum based on analysis of a 183 k SNP array.

Geert van Geest, Roeland E Voorrips, Danny Esselink, Aike Post, Richard Gf Visser, Paul Arens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genomic prediction with allele dosage information in highly polyploid species.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. DNA marker for resistance toBreeding science · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Geert van GeestPlant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 386, 6708 PB, Wageningen, the Netherlands. geert.vangeest@wur.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-1561-078X
Roeland E VoorripsPlant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 386, 6708 PB, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Danny EsselinkPlant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 386, 6708 PB, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Aike PostDeliflor Chrysanten B.V, Korte Kruisweg 163, 2676 BS, Maasdijk, the Netherlands.
Richard Gf VisserPlant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 386, 6708 PB, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Paul ArensPlant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 386, 6708 PB, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCultivated chrysanthemum is an outcrossing hexaploid (2n = 6× = 54) with a disputed mode of inheritance. In this paper, we present a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) selection pipeline that was used to design an Affymetrix Axiom array with 183 k SNPs from RNA sequencing data (1). With this array, we genotyped four bi-parental populations (with sizes of 405, 53, 76 and 37 offspring plants respectively), and a cultivar panel of 63 genotypes. Further, we present a method for dosage scoring in hexaploids from signal intensities of the array based on mixture models (2) and validation of selection steps in the SNP selection pipeline (3). The resulting genotypic data is used to draw conclusions on the mode of inheritance in chrysanthemum (4), and to make an inference on allelic expression bias (5).

resultsWith use of the mixture model approach, we successfully called the dosage of 73,936 out of 183,130 SNPs (40.4%) that segregated in any of the bi-parental populations. To investigate the mode of inheritance, we analysed markers that segregated in the large bi-parental population (n = 405). Analysis of segregation of duplex x nulliplex SNPs resulted in evidence for genome-wide hexasomic inheritance. This evidence was substantiated by the absence of strong linkage between markers in repulsion, which indicated absence of full disomic inheritance. We present the success rate of SNP discovery out of RNA sequencing data as affected by different selection steps, among which SNP coverage over genotypes and use of different types of sequence read mapping software. Genomic dosage highly correlated with relative allele coverage from the RNA sequencing data, indicating that most alleles are expressed according to their genomic dosage.

conclusionsThe large population, genotyped with a very large number of markers, is a unique framework for extensive genetic analyses in hexaploid chrysanthemum. As starting point, we show conclusive evidence for genome-wide hexasomic inheritance.

Indexed as

Oligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisAllelesChrysanthemumGene Expression ProfilingGenotypeInheritance PatternsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, RNAAllelic expression biasDisomicHexaploidPolyploidPolysomicRNA-seqSNP arraySNP retrieval

Identifiers

PMID28784083
PMCPMC5547472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.