ReviewClinical endoscopy2017
Training in Endoscopy: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Simethicone dosages with minimal normal saline solution volume to enhance mucosal visualization in upper endoscopy: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- A newly developed deep learning-based system for automatic detection and classification of small bowel lesions during double-balloon enteroscopy examination.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
- A journey towards pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy and its training: a narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Review
- Simulation-based mastery learning in gastrointestinal endoscopy training.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2022Review
- Identification of gaze pattern and blind spots by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using an eye-tracking technique.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Endoscopy training in Korea.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2019Review
- Virtual reality simulation in endoscopy training: Current evidence and future directions.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastrointestinal endoscopy is important in diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of many diseases of the digestive tract. The ability to perform esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) safely, effectively, and efficiently has become the mainstay of gastroenterology practice. In Korea, EGD education is usually imparted as a component of gastroenterology training programs during fellowship. In this review, we discuss the general principles of EGD training. Formal curriculum development with devising clear goals and effective training methods should be developed in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.