ReviewClinical endoscopy2017
Training in Endoscopy: Colonoscopy.
Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multi-modal training environment for colonoscopy with pressure feedback.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Appendicitis after colonoscopy-a case report, literature review, and synopsis of the pitfalls in diagnosis.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
- [Current Endoscopy Training in Korea and Future Aspects].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2022Review
- Effects of using an abdominal simulator to develop palpatory competencies in 3rd year medical students.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Colonoscopy Trainers Experience Greater Stress During Insertion than Withdrawal: Implications for Endoscopic Curricula.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Screening colonoscopy: The present and the future.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- A Soft Pneumatic Inchworm Double balloon (SPID) for colonoscopy.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Endoscopy training in Korea.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2019Review
- Retrograde colon imaging through colonic transendoscopic enteral tubing helps to confirm the cause of difficult colonoscopy: a case report.Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colonoscopy is effective in reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with colorectal cancer (CRC). Interval cancers or post-colonoscopy CRCs, are cancers detected within the surveillance interval, or between 6-36 months after a clearing colonoscopy. The incidence of interval cancers is 3.4%-9.2% of all detected CRCs, as reported in population-based studies. Colonoscopy is a technically difficult procedure that is challenging to learn, and needs time and effort to gain competency. Therefore, trainee competence is a critical component of CRC screening and surveillance. Herein, we review the colonoscopy training methods and quality assessment metrics for colonoscopy competency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.