Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28783743›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2017

Andrographis paniculata (Chuān Xīn Lián) for symptomatic relief of acute respiratory tract infections in adults and children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xiao-Yang Hu, Ruo-Han Wu, Martin Logue, Clara Blondel, Lily Yuen Wan Lai, Beth Stuart, Andrew Flower, Yu-Tong Fei, Michael Moore, Jonathan Shepherd and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exploring the clinical effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Research in pharmaceutical sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Mechanistic Evidence ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. A randomized controlled pilot study of add-on therapy of CIM-MEG19 (standardizedPhytomedicine plus : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  19. Editorial: Clinical phytopharmacology.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  20. Effect ofFuture journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Xiao-Yang HuPrimary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3143-7999
Ruo-Han WuCentre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Martin LoguePrimary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Clara BlondelAgroParisTech, Paris Institute of Technology for Life, Food and Environmental Sciences, Paris, France.
Lily Yuen Wan LaiPrimary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Beth StuartPrimary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Andrew FlowerPrimary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Yu-Tong FeiCentre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Michael MoorePrimary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Jonathan ShepherdSouthampton Health Technology Assessments Centre (SHTAC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Jian-Ping LiuCentre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
George LewithPrimary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Broadmoor Hospital · GBBeijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNAgroParisTech · FRUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a substantial threat to public health. Safe and effective alternatives are required to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing. Andrographis Paniculata (A. Paniculata, Chuān Xīn Lián) has traditionally been used in Indian and Chinese herbal medicine for cough, cold and influenza, suggesting a role in respiratory tract infections (RTIs). This systematic review aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of A. Paniculata for symptoms of acute RTIs (ARTIs). MATERIALS AND

methodsEnglish and Chinese databases were searched from their inception to March 2016 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating oral A. Paniculata without language barriers (Protocol ID: CRD42016035679). The primary outcomes were improvement in ARTI symptoms and adverse events (AEs). A random effects model was used to pool the mean differences and risk ratio with 95% CI reported. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool; two reviewers independently screened eligibility and extracted data.

resultsThirty-three RCTs (7175 patients) were included. Most trials evaluated A. Paniculata (as a monotherapy and as a herbal mixture) provided commercially but seldom reported manufacturing or quality control details. A. Paniculata improved cough (n = 596, standardised mean difference SMD: -0.39, 95% confidence interval CI [-0.67, -0.10]) and sore throat (n = 314, SMD: -1.13, 95% CI [-1.37, -0.89]) when compared with placebo. A. Paniculata (alone or plus usual care) has a statistically significant effect in improving overall symptoms of ARTIs when compared to placebo, usual care, and other herbal therapies. Evidence also suggested that A. Paniculata (alone or plus usual care) shortened the duration of cough, sore throat and sick leave/time to resolution when compared versus usual care. No major AEs were reported and minor AEs were mainly gastrointestinal. The methodological quality of included trials was overall poor.

conclusionsA. Paniculata appears beneficial and safe for relieving ARTI symptoms and shortening time to symptom resolution. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously owing to poor study quality and heterogeneity. Well-designed trials evaluating the effectiveness and potential to reduce antibiotic use of A. Paniculata are warranted.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdultChildDrugs, Chinese HerbalHumansRespiratory Tract InfectionsSafetyDrugs, Chinese Herbal

Identifiers

PMID28783743
PMCPMC5544222
OpenAlexW2742836413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.