ArticleNature2017
Correction of a pathogenic gene mutation in human embryos.
Article in Nature, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 377 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
377 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 946 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis of cardiomyopathy-associated variants in troponin genes identifies loci and intragenic hot spots that are associated with worse clinical outcomes.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2020Pooled it
- Article
- Cyanine-modified ssODNs enhance CRISPR-Cas9 HDR in stem cell embryo models via chromatin and chemical modulation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Molecular Stability as a Translational Gate: A Structured Framework for Target Validation in Genetic Cardiomyopathy.Cureus · 2026Review
- Developing therapeutics for rare cardiovascular diseases.American heart journal · 2026Review
- TGF-β: The Molecular Mechanisms of Atherosclerosis - insights into SMAD Pathways and Gene Therapy Prospects.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- CRISPR/Cas9 in cancer therapy: clinical translation, mechanistic strategies, and therapeutic directions.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Gene Therapy and Gene Editing: Current Trends and Future Prospects of Molecular Medicine.Current gene therapy · 2026Review
- A NewHuman mutation · 2026Article
- Integrating synthetic biology to understand and engineer the heart, lung, blood, and sleep systems.Cell systems · 2025Review
- Chromatin-associated condensates as an inspiration for the system architecture of future DNA computers.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025Review
- Similarity-based transfer learning with deep learning networks for accurate CRISPR-Cas9 off-target prediction.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- From gut to gamete: how the microbiome influences fertility and preconception health.Microbiome · 2025Review
- Relationship between genotype and clinical phenotype of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.World journal of cardiology · 2025Review
- Review
- Integrative Approaches in the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Comprehensive Review of Current Therapeutic Modalities.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Genome editing strategies for targeted correction of β-globin mutation in sickle cell disease: From bench to bedside.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Review
- Allele conversion between homologous chromosomes via CRISPR-Cas9 and hyperrecombination lines.Plant communications · 2025Article
- The potential of CRISPR-Cas9 in cardiovascular medicine: a focus on hereditary cardiomyopathies.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Review
317 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Expression of concern · 2017-10-02Concerns/Issues about Data ·
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
31 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome editing has potential for the targeted correction of germline mutations. Here we describe the correction of the heterozygous MYBPC3 mutation in human preimplantation embryos with precise CRISPR-Cas9-based targeting accuracy and high homology-directed repair efficiency by activating an endogenous, germline-specific DNA repair response. Induced double-strand breaks (DSBs) at the mutant paternal allele were predominantly repaired using the homologous wild-type maternal gene instead of a synthetic DNA template. By modulating the cell cycle stage at which the DSB was induced, we were able to avoid mosaicism in cleaving embryos and achieve a high yield of homozygous embryos carrying the wild-type MYBPC3 gene without evidence of off-target mutations. The efficiency, accuracy and safety of the approach presented suggest that it has potential to be used for the correction of heritable mutations in human embryos by complementing preimplantation genetic diagnosis. However, much remains to be considered before clinical applications, including the reproducibility of the technique with other heterozygous mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.