Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28783712›Full record

ArticleAging2017

Machine learning for predicting lifespan-extending chemical compounds.

Diogo G Barardo, Danielle Newby, Daniel Thornton, Taravat Ghafourian, João Pedro de Magalhães, Alex A Freitas

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Autophagy and machine learning: Unanswered questions.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Autophagy dark genes: Can we find them with machine learning?Natural sciences (Weinheim, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The quest to slow ageing through drug discovery.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2020
    Review
  18. Identifying Potential Ageing-Modulating Drugs In Silico.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2019
    Review
  19. Computational tools for geroscience.Translational medicine of aging · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Diogo G Barardo *Integrative Genomics of Ageing Group, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Danielle Newby *Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Daniel ThorntonIntegrative Genomics of Ageing Group, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Taravat GhafourianSchool of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, UK.
João Pedro de MagalhãesIntegrative Genomics of Ageing Group, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Alex A FreitasSchool of Computing, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Genomics (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Kent · GBWarneford Hospital · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 104978/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing age is a risk factor for many diseases; therefore developing pharmacological interventions that slow down ageing and consequently postpone the onset of many age-related diseases is highly desirable. In this work we analyse data from the DrugAge database, which contains chemical compounds and their effect on the lifespan of model organisms. Predictive models were built using the machine learning method random forests to predict whether or not a chemical compound will increase Caenorhabditis elegans' lifespan, using as features Gene Ontology (GO) terms annotated for proteins targeted by the compounds and chemical descriptors calculated from each compound's chemical structure. The model with the best predictive accuracy used both biological and chemical features, achieving a prediction accuracy of 80%. The top 20 most important GO terms include those related to mitochondrial processes, to enzymatic and immunological processes, and terms related to metabolic and transport processes. We applied our best model to predict compounds which are more likely to increase C. elegans' lifespan in the DGIdb database, where the effect of the compounds on an organism's lifespan is unknown. The top hit compounds can be broadly divided into four groups: compounds affecting mitochondria, compounds for cancer treatment, anti-inflammatories, and compounds for gonadotropin-releasing hormone therapies.

Indexed as

Databases, PharmaceuticalMachine LearningAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansLongevityageinganti-ageing drugsbioinformaticsC. eleganslongevitymachine learningpharmaceutical interventions

Identifiers

PMID28783712
PMCPMC5559171
OpenAlexW2739273059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.