ArticleNature neuroscience2017
Structure in neural population recordings: an expected byproduct of simpler phenomena?
Article in Nature neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
93 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural subspaces of imagined movements in parietal cortex remain stable over several years in humans.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Trial
- Geometric constraints and cognitive inputs jointly shape emergent brain dynamics and topology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Pretraining of Embodied Recurrent Networks Bridges the Gap Between Artificial and Cortical Neural Activities.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Shared latent representations of speech production for cross-patient speech decoding.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Learning-related population dynamics in right and left dorsal premotor cortex during typing skill acquisition.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Dynamic geometry remapping of neural activity within frontal and subcortical areas during decision-making.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Decoupling simultaneous motor imagination and execution via orthogonal ECoG neural representations.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A brain-wide, trial- and time-dependent deterministic drive synergizes with within-trial noise to time self-initiated actions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- ReBaCCA-ss: Relevance-Balanced Continuum Correlation Analysis With Smoothing and Surrogating for Quantifying Similarity Between Population Spiking Activities.Neural computation · 2026Article
- State-Dependent Dissociation of Shared Input and Directed Information Flow in the Visual Cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Distinct neural dynamics in the ventral hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex during social information processing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Article
- The role of oscillations in grid cells' toroidal topology.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- The geometry of correlated variability leads to highly suboptimal discriminative sensory coding.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Universal differential equations as a unifying modeling language for neuroscience.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Review
- Inferring context-dependent computations through linear approximations of prefrontal cortex dynamics.Science advances · 2024Article
- Reach-dependent reorientation of rotational dynamics in motor cortex.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Prefrontal neuronal dynamics in the absence of task execution.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Orthogonality of sensory and contextual categorical dynamics embedded in a continuum of responses from the second somatosensory cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Preparatory activity and the expansive null-space.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024Review
33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuroscientists increasingly analyze the joint activity of multineuron recordings to identify population-level structures believed to be significant and scientifically novel. Claims of significant population structure support hypotheses in many brain areas. However, these claims require first investigating the possibility that the population structure in question is an expected byproduct of simpler features known to exist in data. Classically, this critical examination can be either intuited or addressed with conventional controls. However, these approaches fail when considering population data, raising concerns about the scientific merit of population-level studies. Here we develop a framework to test the novelty of population-level findings against simpler features such as correlations across times, neurons and conditions. We apply this framework to test two recent population findings in prefrontal and motor cortices, providing essential context to those studies. More broadly, the methodologies we introduce provide a general neural population control for many population-level hypotheses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.