Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28782927›Full record

ReviewBiochemistry2017

Going Deeper: Biomolecular Tools for Acoustic and Magnetic Imaging and Control of Cellular Function.

Dan I Piraner, Arash Farhadi, Hunter C Davis, Di Wu, David Maresca, Jerzy O Szablowski, Mikhail G Shapiro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Acoustic percolation switches enable targeted drug delivery controlled by diagnostic ultrasound.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Biogenic Imaging Contrast Agents.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dan I PiranerDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, ‡Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, and §Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, California 91125, United States.
Arash FarhadiDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, ‡Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, and §Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, California 91125, United States.
Hunter C DavisDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, ‡Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, and §Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, California 91125, United States.
Di WuDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, ‡Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, and §Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, California 91125, United States.
David MarescaDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, ‡Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, and §Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, California 91125, United States.
Jerzy O SzablowskiDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, ‡Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, and §Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, California 91125, United States.
Mikhail G ShapiroDivision of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, ‡Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, and §Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, California 91125, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0291-4215
California Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Biogenic Gas Nanostructures As Molecular Imaging Reporters For UltrasoundR01EB018975 · NIBIB · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Mikhail Shapiro · 2014 to 2026
$5.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB018975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most cellular phenomena of interest to mammalian biology occur within the context of living tissues and organisms. However, today's most advanced tools for observing and manipulating cellular function, based on fluorescent or light-controlled proteins, work best in cultured cells, transparent model species, or small, surgically accessed anatomical regions. Their reach into deep tissues and larger animals is limited by photon scattering. To overcome this limitation, we must design biochemical tools that interface with more penetrant forms of energy. For example, sound waves and magnetic fields easily permeate most biological tissues, allowing the formation of images and delivery of energy for actuation. These capabilities are widely used in clinical techniques such as diagnostic ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, focused ultrasound ablation, and magnetic particle hyperthermia. Each of these modalities offers spatial and temporal precision that could be used to study a multitude of cellular processes in vivo. However, connecting these techniques to cellular functions such as gene expression, proliferation, migration, and signaling requires the development of new biochemical tools that can interact with sound waves and magnetic fields as optogenetic tools interact with photons. Here, we discuss the exciting challenges this poses for biomolecular engineering and provide examples of recent advances pointing the way to greater depth in in vivo cell biology.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiochemistryEngineeringHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID28782927
PMCPMC6058970
OpenAlexW2742240391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.