Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28782543›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychologia2017

The active construction of the visual world.

Thomas Parr, Karl J Friston

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Gradient-Free De Novo Learning.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Many Roles of Precision in Action.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. TheFrontiers in psychology · 2022
    Article
  14. The Active Inference Model of Coherence Therapy.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Markov blankets in the brain.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas ParrWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, WC1N 3BG, UK. Electronic address: thomas.parr.12@ucl.ac.uk.
Karl J FristonWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, WC1N 3BG, UK. Electronic address: k.friston@ucl.ac.uk.
University College London · GBWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What we see is fundamentally dependent on where we look. Despite this seemingly obvious statement, many accounts of the neurobiology underpinning visual perception fail to consider the active nature of how we sample our sensory world. This review offers an overview of the neurobiology of visual perception, which begins with the control of saccadic eye movements. Starting from here, we can follow the anatomy backwards, to try to understand the functional architecture of neuronal networks that support the interrogation of a visual scene. Many of the principles encountered in this exercise are equally applicable to other perceptual modalities. For example, the somatosensory system, like the visual system, requires the sampling of data through mobile receptive epithelia. Analysis of a somatosensory scene depends on what is palpated, in much the same way that visual analysis relies on what is foveated. The discussion here is structured around the anatomical systems involved in active vision and visual scene construction, but will use these systems to introduce some general theoretical considerations. We will additionally highlight points of contact between the biology and the pathophysiology that has been proposed to cause a clinical disorder of scene construction - spatial hemineglect.

Indexed as

AnimalsAttentionBrain StemCerebral CortexFunctional LateralityHumansMemoryNeural PathwaysSaccadesVision, OcularAttentionBayesianHemineglectMemorySaccadesSalienceScene construction

Identifiers

PMID28782543
PMCPMC5637165
OpenAlexW2744346435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.