Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28782244›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2017

Using the affective bias test to predict drug-induced negative affect: implications for drug safety.

S A Stuart, C M Wood, E S J Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Validation of a non-food or water motivated effort-based foraging task as a measure of motivational state in male mice.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neuropsychological Effects of Antidepressants: Translational Studies.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Chronic Administration of 13-cis-retinoic Acid Induces Depression-Like Behavior by Altering the Activity of Dentate Granule Cells.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S A StuartSchool of Physiology and Pharmacology, Biomedical Sciences, University Walk, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8465-2692
C M WoodSchool of Physiology and Pharmacology, Biomedical Sciences, University Walk, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
E S J RobinsonSchool of Physiology and Pharmacology, Biomedical Sciences, University Walk, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L011212/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposePredicting the risk of drug-induced adverse psychiatric effects is important but currently not possible in non-human species. We investigated whether the affective bias test (ABT) could provide a preclinical method with translational and predictive validity. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The ABT is a bowl-digging task, which quantifies biases associated with learning and memory. Rats encounter independent learning experiences, on separate days, under either acute manipulations (e.g. pro-depressant vs. control) or different absolute reward values (e.g. high vs. low). A bias is observed during a preference test when an animal's choices reflect their prior experience. We investigated the effects of putative pro-depressant drug treatments following acute or chronic administration on the formation of an affective bias or reward-induced positive bias respectively. KEY

resultsThe immunomodulators LPS (10 μg·kg CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The ABT has the potential to provide a novel approach to predict pro-depressant risk in a non-human species. Negative biases induced by acute treatment in the standard version of the task may also predict longer-term effects on reward processing as shown by the deficit in reward-induced positive bias following chronic treatment, an effect distinct from anhedonia in the SPT. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Pharmacology of Cognition: a Panacea for Neuropsychiatric Disease? To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v174.19/issuetoc.

Indexed as

AffectAcetatesAnimalsCarbamazepineChoice BehaviorCorticosteroneCyclopropanesDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalImmunologic FactorsInterferon-alphaLearningLipopolysaccharidesMaleQuinolinesRats, Sprague-DawleyRewardAcetatesCarbamazepineCorticosteroneCyclopropanesImmunologic FactorsInterferon-alphaLipopolysaccharidesmontelukastQuinolinesSucroseSulfidesTetrabenazineVarenicline

Identifiers

PMID28782244
PMCPMC5595760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.