Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28782059›Full record

ArticleCSCW : proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work

Measuring Global Disease with Wikipedia: Success, Failure, and a Research Agenda.

Reid Priedhorsky, Dave Osthus, Ashlynn R Daughton, Kelly R Moran, Nicholas Generous, Geoffrey Fairchild, Alina Deshpande, Sara Y Del Valle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CSCW : proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Reid PriedhorskyHigh Performance Computing (HPC) Division.
Dave OsthusComputer, Computational, and Statistical Sciences (CCS) Division.
Ashlynn R DaughtonAnalytics, Intelligence, and Technology (A) Division Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM.
Kelly R MoranAnalytics, Intelligence, and Technology (A) Division Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM.
Nicholas GenerousAnalytics, Intelligence, and Technology (A) Division Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM.
Geoffrey FairchildAnalytics, Intelligence, and Technology (A) Division Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM.
Alina DeshpandeAnalytics, Intelligence, and Technology (A) Division Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM.
Sara Y Del ValleAnalytics, Intelligence, and Technology (A) Division Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM.

Funding

Quantifying Model Uncertainty for Forecasting the Spread of Infectious DiseasesU01GM097658 · NIGMS · LOS ALAMOS NAT SECTY-LOS ALAMOS NAT LAB · PI DEL VALLE, SARA · 2011 to 2015
$3.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM097658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective disease monitoring provides a foundation for effective public health systems. This has historically been accomplished with patient contact and bureaucratic aggregation, which tends to be slow and expensive. Recent internet-based approaches promise to be real-time and cheap, with few parameters. However, the question of

Indexed as

DiseaseepidemiologyforecastingG.3. Probability and statistics: Correlation and regression analysisH.1.1. Systems and information theory: Value of informationH.3.5. Online information services: Web-based servicesJ.3. Life and medical sciences: HealthmodelingWikipedia

Identifiers

PMID28782059
PMCPMC5542563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.