Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28782005›Full record

ArticleScience advances2017

Tool-assisted rhythmic drumming in palm cockatoos shares key elements of human instrumental music.

Robert Heinsohn, Christina N Zdenek, Ross B Cunningham, John A Endler, Naomi E Langmore

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rhythm Across Species: Situating Human Speech in a Comparative Framework.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Individual preferences for sound tool design in a parrot.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Innovative problem solving in macaws.Learning & behavior · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Robert HeinsohnFenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia.
Christina N ZdenekSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0385-500X
Ross B CunninghamFenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia.
John A EndlerCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3216, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7557-7627
Naomi E LangmoreResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia.
Australian National University · AUDeakin University · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All human societies have music with a rhythmic "beat," typically produced with percussive instruments such as drums. The set of capacities that allows humans to produce and perceive music appears to be deeply rooted in human biology, but an understanding of its evolutionary origins requires cross-taxa comparisons. We show that drumming by palm cockatoos (

Indexed as

CockatoosMusicSoundTool Use BehaviorAnimalsHumansanimal tool usebiomusicalityevolution of rhythm

Identifiers

PMID28782005
PMCPMC5489270
OpenAlexW2732040116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.