ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2017
Clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics in patients with AFP-secreting gastric carcinoma.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic value of serum alpha-fetoprotein levels in patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Pooled it
- Dual-positive gastric cancer co-expressing AFP and CEA: an aggressive subtype defined by unique clinical and biological profiles.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- High serum alpha-fetoprotein and positive immunohistochemistry of alpha-fetoprotein are related to poor prognosis of gastric cancer with liver metastasis.Scientific reports · 2024Review
- An unusual cause of significantly elevated blood alpha-fetoprotein levels: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Long-term survival with nivolumab followed by irinotecan after total gastrectomy in alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric cancer: a case report and review of the literature.Surgical case reports · 2023Article
- Case report: Significant response to PD-L1 inhibitor after resistance to PD-1 inhibitor in an advanced alpha-fetoprotein-positive gastric cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Effective treatment of apatinib for chemotherapy-refractory advanced gastric carcinoma with AFP-secretion and HER2-positivity: A case report.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2021Article
- Efficacy and safety of apatinib for the treatment of AFP-producing gastric cancer.Translational oncology · 2021Article
- Effective Treatment of Cytotoxic Agent Refractory Alpha-Fetoprotein-Producing Gastric Cancer with Ramucirumab: a Case Report and Review of the Literature.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2019Review
- Alpha-fetoprotein Secreting Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Liver: a Case Report and Literature Review.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to determine whether there are any clinicopathological or prognostic differences between patients with α-fetoprotein-secreting gastric carcinoma (AFP-SGC) and non-AFP-SGC. Pathological parameters, clinical parameters, and treatment efficacy were compared in patients with AFP-SGC and non-AFP-SGC. In total, 362 patients (53 with AFP-SGC and 309 with non-AFP-SGC) were included in the present study. Patients with AFP-SGC had significantly higher levels of lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion (PNI), rate of liver metastasis, and stage IV cancer compared with patients with non-AFP-SGC (P<0.05). The median overall survival (OS) rate was 12.6 months in the AFP-SGC group, and 22.1 months in the non-AFP-SGC group (P<0.001). The median OS and disease free survival (DFS) of patients with stage I-III AFP-SGC were 28.1 and 13.4 months, respectively, whereas for patients with non-AFP-SGC, the OS and DFS were 45.3 and 38.0 months, respectively (P=0.01; P=0.02). The median OS for the stage IV AFP-SGC and non-AFP-SGC groups was 9.3 and 11.5 months, respectively (P=0.14). Multivariate analysis of the entire patient group revealed that the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score of ≥2, lymph node involvement, presence of PNI, high levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, and distant metastasis were significantly correlated with OS. The lymph node involvement, ECOG performance score of ≥2, AFP-SGC type, and weight loss at diagnosis were also significant factors influencing the DFS in the stage I-III group. In conclusion, patients with AFP-SGC had more aggressive clinicopathological features and biological behavior with an increased tendency of liver metastasis compared with patients with non-AFP-SGC. In the near future, AFP may become an important surrogate marker to manage therapies of patients with gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.