Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28781767›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2017

Senescence in the aging process.

Richard Ga Faragher, Anne McArdle, Alison Willows, Elizabeth L Ostler

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Normal Aging and Its Role in Cancer Metastasis.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Cellular Senescence in Neurodegenerative Diseases.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  16. A dynamical systems model for the measurement of cellular senescence.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2019
    Article
  17. Hallmarks of senescence and aging.Biochemia medica · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard Ga FaragherStress, Ageing and Disease Research Group, School of Pharmacy & Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, East Sussex, UK.
Anne McArdleInstitute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Alison WillowsStress, Ageing and Disease Research Group, School of Pharmacy & Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, East Sussex, UK.
Elizabeth L OstlerStress, Ageing and Disease Research Group, School of Pharmacy & Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, East Sussex, UK.
University of Brighton · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accumulation of 'senescent' cells has long been proposed to act as an ageing mechanism. These cells display a radically altered transcriptome and degenerative phenotype compared with their growing counterparts. Tremendous progress has been made in recent years both in understanding the molecular mechanisms controlling entry into the senescent state and in the direct demonstration that senescent cells act as causal agents of mammalian ageing. The challenges now are to gain a better understanding of how the senescent cell phenotype varies between different individuals and tissues, discover how senescence predisposes to organismal frailty, and develop mechanisms by which the deleterious effects of senescent cells can be ameliorated.

Indexed as

agingfibroblastlifespansenescenttelomere

Identifiers

PMID28781767
PMCPMC5531163
OpenAlexW2736848604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.