ArticleOncology letters2017
Long-term validation of a molecular progression-associated gene classifier for prediction of muscle invasion in primary non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Article in Oncology letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A molecular landscape tracking the progression of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.World journal of urology · 2026Review
- Molecular biomarkers of progression in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer - beyond conventional risk stratification.Nature reviews. Urology · 2025Review
- Prognostic Implications of Immune-Related Gene Pairs Signatures in Bladder Cancer.Journal of oncology · 2021Article
- Utility of Image Morphometry in the Atypical Urothelial Cells and High-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma Categories of the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology.Journal of cytologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our previous study reported a clinically applicable prognostic gene classifier for primary non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The present study aimed to perform long-term validation of this classifier in the prediction of muscle-invasive disease. Previously published gene expression profiles were used from 176 patients with NMIBC with extended follow-up. Progression was defined as development of muscle invasion or metastasis, and the progression risk score was calculated using the previously developed eight-gene progression classifier. During median follow-up of 72.8 (interquartile range, 37.0-118.7) months, 26 (14.8%) patients progressed to muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The molecular progression risk score was significantly associated with clinicopathological variables, including tumor number, stage, grade and multivariate risk assessment tools (P<0.05 in each case). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that molecular progression risk score was an independent predictor of development of invasive tumor, either as a continuous variable [hazard ratio (HR), 1.489; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.216-1.823; P<0.001] or as a categorical variable (HR, 5.026; 95% CI, 1.619-15.608; P=0.005). In conclusion, the present results confirmed the clinical utility of the progression-associated gene classifier for prediction of development of muscle invasion in NMIBC. The molecular progression risk score may aid in selecting patients who could benefit from more aggressive therapeutic intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.