ArticleOncology letters2017
Clinical application value of 3.0T MR diffusion tensor imaging in grade diagnosis of gliomas.
Article in Oncology letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Nerve abnormalities in lumbar disc herniation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diffusion tensor imaging.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- ADC-Based Stratification of Molecular Glioma Subtypes Using High b-Value Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Radiogenomics correlation between MR imaging features and mRNA-based subtypes in lower-grade glioma.BMC neurology · 2020Article
- Automatic Histogram Specification for Glioma Grading Using Multicenter Data.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical value of MR diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in grade diagnosis of gliomas was investigated. A total of 31 patients with glioma were administered 3.0T MR convention and DTI examination, with quantitative measurement of anisotropy coefficient fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent dispersion coefficient (ADC) value, and the comparison of quantitative parameters of glioma between low- and high-grade, which was detected by Mann-Whitney U test. The receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to take the value of ADC and FA in tumor ROI as a critical point, to calculate the area under the curve and to confirm the diagnosis threshold value and evaluate its diagnostic efficiency. The FA value of 14 low-grade glioma cases was 139.4±81.3, with an ADC value of (1.36±0.21) ×10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.