Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28781551›Full record

ArticlePhytoKeys2017

Scientific user requirements for a herbarium data portal.

Jorick Vissers, Frederik Van den Bosch, Ann Bogaerts, Christine Cocquyt, Jérôme Degreef, Denis Diagre, Myriam de Haan, Sofie De Smedt, Henry Engledow, Damien Ertz and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PhytoKeys, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The use and misuse of herbarium specimens in evaluating plant extinction risks.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Jorick VissersClockwork, Ordina, Blarenberglaan 3B, B-2800 Mechelen, Belgium.
Frederik Van den BoschClockwork, Ordina, Blarenberglaan 3B, B-2800 Mechelen, Belgium.
Ann BogaertsBotanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium.
Christine CocquytBotanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium.
Jérôme DegreefBotanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium.
Denis DiagreBotanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium.
Myriam de HaanBotanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium.
Sofie De SmedtBotanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium.
Henry EngledowBotanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium.
Damien ErtzBotanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium.
Régine FabriBotanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium.
Sandrine GodefroidBotanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium.
Nicole HanquartBotanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium.
Patricia MergenBotanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium.
Anne RonseBotanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium.
Marc SosefBotanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium.
Tariq StévartBotanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium.
Piet StoffelenBotanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium.
Sonia VanderhoevenBelgian Biodiversity Platform, Belgian Science Policy Office (BELSPO), Avenue Louise 231, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Quentin GroomBotanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The digitization of herbaria and their online access will greatly facilitate access to plant collections around the world. This will improve the efficiency of taxonomy and help reduce inequalities between scientists. The Botanic Garden Meise, Belgium, is currently digitizing 1.2 million specimens including label data. In this paper we describe the user requirements analysis conducted for a new herbarium web portal. The aim was to identify the required functionality, but also to assist in the prioritization of software development and data acquisition. The Garden conducted the analysis in cooperation with Clockwork, the digital engagement agency of Ordina. Using a series of interactive interviews, potential users were consulted from universities, research institutions, science-policy initiatives and the Botanic Garden Meise. Although digital herbarium data have many potential stakeholders, we focused on the needs of taxonomists, ecologists and historians, who are currently the primary users of the Meise herbarium data portal. The three categories of user have similar needs, all wanted as much specimen data as possible, and for those data, to be interlinked with other digital resources within and outside the Garden. Many users wanted an interactive system that they could comment on, or correct online, particularly if such corrections and annotations could be used to rank the reliability of data. Many requirements depend on the quality of the digitized data associated with each specimen. The essential data fields are the taxonomic name; geographic location; country; collection date; collector name and collection number. Also all researchers valued linkage between biodiversity literature and specimens. Nevertheless, to verify digitized data the researchers still want access to high quality images, even if fully transcribed label information is provided. The only major point of disagreement is the level of access users should have and what they should be allowed to do with the data and images. Not all of the user requirements are feasible given the current technical and regulatory landscape, however, the potential of these suggestions is discussed. Currently, there is no off-the-shelf solution to satisfy all these user requirements, but the intention of this paper is to guide other herbaria who are prioritising their investment in digitization and online web functionality.

Indexed as

Botanic gardencollectionsdatabasedata sharingdigitizationscience infrastructure

Identifiers

PMID28781551
PMCPMC5543274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.