Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28781448›Full record

ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology

Effects of propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia induction on hemodynamics in patients undergoing fiberoptic intubation for cervical spine surgery: A randomized, controlled, clinical trial.

Chiara Robba, Ega Qeva, Beatrice Borsellino, Simone Aloisio, Giulia Tosti, Federico Bilotta

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mechanisms for propofol in inhibiting the proliferation and invasion of glioma U87 cells and its effect on miR-134 expression.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chiara RobbaDepartment of Neursciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
Ega QevaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Section of Neuroanaesthesia and Neurocritical Care, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Beatrice BorsellinoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Section of Neuroanaesthesia and Neurocritical Care, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Simone AloisioDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Section of Neuroanaesthesia and Neurocritical Care, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Giulia TostiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Section of Neuroanaesthesia and Neurocritical Care, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Federico BilottaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Section of Neuroanaesthesia and Neurocritical Care, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.
University of Cambridge · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsIn patients undergoing surgery for cervical myelopathy, induction of general anesthesia can induce systemic arterial hypotension that may worsen spinal cord hypoperfusion and precipitate spinal injury. In this randomized, controlled, clinical trial study, we compared the hemodynamic changes related to anesthesia induction with intravenous (IV) propofol- and sevoflurane-based inhalational induction in patients undergoing fiberoptic intubation for cervical spine surgery. MATERIAL AND

methodsA total of 72 patients were studied. Hemodynamic effects were assessed measuring mean arterial pressure (MAP), and the echocardiographic evaluation of the left ventricular function. A Student's

resultsPatients assigned to total IV anesthetic approach had a lower MAP, and more significant changes in cardiac function compared to those who received the inhalational approach (68.1 ± 9.3 mmHg vs. 75.5 ± 10.3 mmHg; 25% vs. 5.5%).

conclusionAnesthesia induction with both propofol or sevoflurane is safe and effective. However, total IV anesthesia induction is associated with more pronounced MAP drop which can worsen spinal cord hypoperfusion.

Indexed as

Arterial blood pressurecervical myelopathycervical spine surgeryfiberoptic intubationhemodynamichypoperfusionneuroanesthesiapropofolsevofluranespinal cord

Identifiers

PMID28781448
PMCPMC5520595
OpenAlexW2743654180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.