Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28781379›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of applied ecology2017

Re-evaluating strategies for pollinator-dependent crops: How useful is parthenocarpy?

Jessica L Knapp, Lewis J Bartlett, Juliet L Osborne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of applied ecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Pollinator nutrition and its role in merging the dual objectives of pollinator health and optimal crop production.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Frontiers in effective control of problem parasites in beekeeping.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Opportunities to reduce pollination deficits and address production shortfalls in an important insect-pollinated crop.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica L KnappEnvironment and Sustainability Institute University of Exeter Penryn Campus Penryn Cornwall TR10 9FE UK.
Lewis J BartlettCentre for Ecology and Conservation University of Exeter, Penryn Campus Penryn Cornwall TR10 9FE UK.
Juliet L OsborneEnvironment and Sustainability Institute University of Exeter Penryn Campus Penryn Cornwall TR10 9FE UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whilst most studies reviewing the reliance of global agriculture on insect pollination advocate increasing the 'supply' of pollinators (wild or managed) to improve crop yields, there has been little focus on altering a crop's 'demand' for pollinators.Parthenocarpy (fruit set in the absence of fertilization) is a trait which can increase fruit quantity and quality from pollinator-dependent crops by removing the need for pollination.Here we present a meta-analysis of studies examining the extent and effectiveness of parthenocarpy-promoting techniques (genetic modification, hormone application and selective breeding) currently being used commercially, or experimentally, on pollinator-dependent crops in different test environments (no pollination, hand pollination, open pollination).All techniques significantly increased fruit quantity and quality in 18 pollinator-dependent crop species (not including seed and nut crops as parthenocarpy causes seedlessness). The degree to which plants experienced pollen limitation in the different test environments could not be ascertained, so the absolute effect of parthenocarpy relative to optimal pollination could not be determined.

Indexed as

agricultural yieldagriculturecommercial cropsfood securityfruit setparthenocarpypollinationpollinator declinepollinator dependence

Identifiers

PMID28781379
PMCPMC5516152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.