ArticleStem cell reports2017
Rapid Generation of Human Genetic Loss-of-Function iPSC Lines by Simultaneous Reprogramming and Gene Editing.
Article in Stem cell reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reverse bioengineering of the liver: developmental principles for next-generation liver-on-a-chip systems.Communications biology · 2026Review
- Delayed forebrain excitatory and inhibitory neurogenesis in STRADA-related megalencephaly via mTOR hyperactivity.Stem cell reports · 2026Article
- Cryopreservation of human cortical organoids using vitrification.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2026Article
- Human Medial Ganglionic Eminence Organoids Robustly Generate Parvalbumin Interneurons and Fast-Spiking Neurons and Reveal Migratory Deficits inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Antisense oligonucleotides modulate aberrant inclusion of poison exons in SCN1A-related Dravet syndrome.JCI insight · 2025Article
- Unraveling the Neural Circuits: Techniques, Opportunities and Challenges in Epilepsy Research.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2024Review
- Gene editing and reprogramming of human fibroblast cells (hFBs) to human pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs).Neuromethods · 2024Article
- Deriving early single-rosette brain organoids from human pluripotent stem cells.Stem cell reports · 2023Article
- Engineering considerations of iPSC-based personalized medicine.Biomaterials research · 2023Review
- Article
- A Shared Pathogenic Mechanism for Valproic Acid and SHROOM3 Knockout in a Brain Organoid Model of Neural Tube Defects.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Modeling Epilepsy Using Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells-Derived Neuronal Cultures Carrying Mutations in Ion Channels and the Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Pathway.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022Review
- Simultaneous high-efficiency base editing and reprogramming of patient fibroblasts.Stem cell reports · 2021Article
- A piggyBac-based platform for genome editing and clonal rhesus macaque iPSC line derivation.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- STRADA-mutant human cortical organoids model megalencephaly and exhibit delayed neuronal differentiation.Developmental neurobiology · 2021Article
- The Development of Herbicide Resistance Crop Plants Using CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing.Genes · 2021Review
- Isolation of human ESC-derived cardiac derivatives and embryonic heart cells for population and single-cell RNA-seq analysis.STAR protocols · 2021Article
- CHD2-Related CNS Pathologies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Variant-specific changes in persistent or resurgent sodium current in SCN8A-related epilepsy patient-derived neurons.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2020Article
- Versatility of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) for Improving the Knowledge on Musculoskeletal Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Specifically ablating genes in human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) allows for studies of gene function as well as disease mechanisms in disorders caused by loss-of-function (LOF) mutations. While techniques exist for engineering such lines, we have developed and rigorously validated a method of simultaneous iPSC reprogramming while generating CRISPR/Cas9-dependent insertions/deletions (indels). This approach allows for the efficient and rapid formation of genetic LOF human disease cell models with isogenic controls. The rate of mutagenized lines was strikingly consistent across experiments targeting four different human epileptic encephalopathy genes and a metabolic enzyme-encoding gene, and was more efficient and consistent than using CRISPR gene editing of established iPSC lines. The ability of our streamlined method to reproducibly generate heterozygous and homozygous LOF iPSC lines with passage-matched isogenic controls in a single step provides for the rapid development of LOF disease models with ideal control lines, even in the absence of patient tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.