Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28780740›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2017

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards prostate cancer screening amongst men living in the southern Italian peninsula: the Prevention and Research in Oncology (PRO) non-profit Foundation experience.

Vincenzo Mirone, Ciro Imbimbo, Davide Arcaniolo, Marco Franco, Roberto La Rocca, Luca Venturino, Lorenzo Spirito, Massimiliano Creta, Paolo Verze

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Knowledge and Attitudes towards Prostate Cancer and Screening among Males in Limpopo Province, South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vincenzo MironeUrology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Sciences of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, Università degli studi di Napoli "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Ciro ImbimboUrology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Sciences of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, Università degli studi di Napoli "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Davide ArcanioloUrology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, Università degli studi della Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Marco FrancoUrology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Sciences of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, Università degli studi di Napoli "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Roberto La RoccaUrology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Sciences of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, Università degli studi di Napoli "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Luca VenturinoUrology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Sciences of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, Università degli studi di Napoli "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Lorenzo SpiritoUrology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Sciences of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, Università degli studi di Napoli "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Massimiliano CretaUrology Unit, Buon Consiglio Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Paolo VerzeUrology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Sciences of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, Università degli studi di Napoli "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. pverze@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to explore the knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards prostate cancer (PCa) risk factors and prevention amongst men living in the southern Italian peninsula.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed data collected during free preventive visits carried out by the Prevention and Research in Oncology (PRO) non-profit Foundation between July 2013 and July 2016. The following data were collected: demographic and clinical features, knowledge about PCa prevention and sources of knowledge, knowledge about PCa risk factors, previous prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test, previous digital rectal examination (DRE), previous prostate ultrasound, and general attitudes towards DRE.

resultsThe study population consisted of 2144 Caucasian men living in four regions in the south of Italy (Campania, Calabria, Molise, Puglia). Median age was 59 years. One thousand six hundred and ninety-nine (79.2%) subjects reported knowing the existence of PCa prevention programs. Most of them received information from the media while only 17.1% declared that the information on PCa prevention that they received was from their family physicians. One thousand two hundred seventy-five (59.5%) subjects declared knowing of the existence of PCa risk factors and 41.3% was aware of the existence of both genetic and exogenous factors. The percentage of subjects who reported having had at least one PSA test in their life was 77.8 and 55.4% reported having had a DRE.

conclusionsKnowledge about PCa screening amongst male subjects living in southern peninsular Italy is quite high. Knowledge of PCa risk factors is suboptimal and the practice of DRE is underutilized.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePreventive Health ServicesProstatic NeoplasmsDigital Rectal ExaminationHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedProstateProstate-Specific AntigenRisk FactorsProstate-Specific AntigenDigital rectal examinationProstate cancerProstate-specific antigenScreening

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.