Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28780709›Full record

ArticlePediatric cardiology2017

Stent Therapy for Aortic Coarctation in Children <30 kg: Use of the Low Profile Valeo Stent.

Sok-Leng Kang, Andrew Tometzki, Demetris Taliotis, Robin Martin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Hypertension in aortic coarctation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Coarctation of the Aorta: Diagnosis and Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Indications for stenting of coarctation of the aorta in children under 3 months of age.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sok-Leng KangBristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Paul O'Gorman Building, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol, BS2 8BJ, UK.
Andrew TometzkiBristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Paul O'Gorman Building, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol, BS2 8BJ, UK.
Demetris TaliotisBristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Paul O'Gorman Building, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol, BS2 8BJ, UK.
Robin MartinBristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Paul O'Gorman Building, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol, BS2 8BJ, UK. rob.martin@UHBristol.nhs.uk.
Bristol Royal Hospital for Children · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To report our experience of coarctation stent therapy in small children weighing less than 30 kg, with the low profile dilatable Valeo stent and review the literature on coarctation stent therapy in this patient population. Coarctation stent implantation was undertaken in 14 consecutive children using the Bard Valeo Stent. Demographic, angiographic, echocardiographic and clinical data were reviewed retrospectively. The median age at the time of procedure was 5.1 (2.6-7.5) years and median weight was 20.8 (14.7-27) kg. There was improvement in median coarctation diameter from 4 (1.3-5.2) to 9.5 (5.8-12.7) mm, p < 0.001; and a reduction in the median peak pressure gradient across the coarctation from 35 (20-49) to 9 (0-15) mmHg, p < 0.001. Median stent recoil was 7.9 (0-20)%. There was one case of access related complication that resolved without sequelae. Follow-up was a median of 15 (3.0-57.2) months. CT angiogram performed at a median time of 3.3 (2.6-10.2) months post procedure showed no aortic wall injury and preserved stent integrity in all cases. Two children underwent re-intervention for stent dilation and further stent implantation due to in-stent stenosis and somatic growth after 3 years. Six of fourteen children remained on a single antihypertensive agent post-intervention at last follow-up. Implantation of the dilatable Valeo stent is a feasible treatment strategy in native or recurrent coarctation in small children, accepting that additional stent implantation may be necessary with somatic growth. Further study is required to determine longer-term stent efficacy and clinical outcome.

Indexed as

AngiographyAntihypertensive AgentsAortaAortic CoarctationCardiac CatheterizationChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleProsthesis DesignRetrospective StudiesStentsTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive AgentsAortic coarctationCardiac catheterizationChildStents

Identifiers

PMID28780709
OpenAlexW2742917693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.