ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2017
Bicuspid Aortic Valvulopathy and Associated Aortopathy: a Review of Contemporary Studies Relevant to Clinical Decision-Making.
Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Aortic valvular imaging with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: seeking for comprehensiveness.The British journal of radiology · 2019Review
- Novel Approaches for BAV Aortopathy Prediction-Is There a Need for Cohort Studies and Biomarkers?Biomolecules · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementThe bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) phenotype is becoming increasingly recognized as a complex and heterogeneous clinical entity, with some but not all patients developing accelerated degrees of both aortic insufficiency (AI) and aortic stenosis (AS) in comparison to patients with tricuspid aortic valves (TAV). In addition, there remains a well-established association between the BAV phenotype and aortic enlargement independent of valve function as well as progression among some to ascending aortic aneurysm and the attendant concern over risk of aortic dissection. Because the understanding of the complexity of the BAV phenotype is evolving as quickly as are the options for medical, surgical, and interventional therapy, this review aims to provide an update on the most clinically relevant recent advances in the realm of BAV and associated aortopathy from a genetic, morphologic, and clinical outcomes perspective in order to give the practicing clinician a deeper understanding of how to approach both medical and surgical decision-making in the patient with BAV. The following major principles have emerged in recent years including (1) the importance of cusp anatomy and its implications on the long-term risk of AI, aortic dilation, and aortic dissection, (2) the role of post-valvular flow dynamics in the pathogenesis of aortic dilation in BAV patients, (3) the ability of aortic valve replacement to halt accelerated dilation rates, and (4) the finding that the risk of aortic dissection, while still overall intermediate is much more akin to the baseline risk present in TAV patients rather than the much higher rates observed in patients with Marfan's disease. Together, these data support the less aggressive approach to aortic replacement in BAV patients as reflected in the most recent ACC/AHA guidelines and provide a stronger basis upon which future studies, including those aimed at medical and transcatheter therapies, stand to make further impact on our ability to optimally treat this epidemiologically important and complex population of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.