Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28780661›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2017

Unique Presentations and Etiologies of Myocardial Infarction in Women.

Marysia S Tweet, Patricia Best, Sharonne N Hayes

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection, a commonly overlooked etiology of acute coronary syndrome.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marysia S TweetDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. tweet.marysia@mayo.edu.
Patricia BestDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Sharonne N HayesDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementDespite recent efforts to reduce cardiovascular disease, it remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among women, particularly younger women. When compared to men, women have more inpatient complications, mortality, heart failure, and stroke following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) despite having less obstructive coronary artery disease. Moreover, women are less likely to have AMI from plaque rupture than men, and more likely to experience alternate etiologies of AMI including plaque erosion and spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Herein, we discuss current knowledge regarding women's unique experience of AMI, including demographics, presentation, etiologies, and acute and outpatient care.

Indexed as

Acute coronary syndromeAcute myocardial infarctionCoronary vasospasmMicrovascular diseaseSpontaneous coronary artery dissectionWomen

Identifiers

PMID28780661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.