Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28780635›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2017

Convective Radiofrequency Water Vapor Thermal Therapy with Rezūm System.

Sevann Helo, Bradley Holland, Kevin T McVary

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05851521 (HERMES Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05851521 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

HERMES Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial To Evaluate Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Differences Between Indwelling Catheter And Temporary Prostatic Stent In Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Procedures For The Treatment Of Localized Prostate Cancer Or Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

TypeinterventionalSponsorLyx InstituteRan2023 to 2025Enrolled120ConditionsLower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Prostatic Hyperplasia, Prostatic Cancer, Urinary RetentionArmsTemporary prostatic stent (Exime®), Indwelling catheter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sevann HeloDivision of Urology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, St. John's Pavilion, 301 North Eighth St., P.O. Box 19665, Springfield, IL, 62794-9665, USA.
Bradley HollandDivision of Urology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, St. John's Pavilion, 301 North Eighth St., P.O. Box 19665, Springfield, IL, 62794-9665, USA.
Kevin T McVaryDivision of Urology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, St. John's Pavilion, 301 North Eighth St., P.O. Box 19665, Springfield, IL, 62794-9665, USA. kmcvary@siumed.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are amongst the most commonly treated conditions by urologists. Minimally invasive therapies for the treatment of BPH/LUTS have garnered increased interest as new technology has emerged, improving durability, efficacy, and safety. This paper reviews the most recent literature regarding water vapor therapy, a convective thermal therapy that ablates prostatic tissue. RECENT

findingsThe current literature includes a pilot study of 65 men and a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 197 men investigating the efficacy and safety profile of water vapor therapy up to 2 years. Subjects treated with water vapor therapy demonstrated a 51% reduction in IPSS from baseline, sustained at 24 months (p < 0.0001). Durable improvements in max flow rate (Qmax) and quality of life (QoL) were also achieved, while no changes in sexual function were observed. Reporting of adverse events (AEs) reveals predominantly Clavien grade I complications that were self-limited. The clinical efficacy and safety of water vapor therapy are durable to 24 months making it an attractive alternative for patients seeking a minimally invasive treatment for LUTS due to BPH.

Indexed as

Radiofrequency TherapySteamAblation TechniquesHumansLower Urinary Tract SymptomsMaleProstatic HyperplasiaQuality of LifeSteamLower urinary tract symptomsMinimally invasive therapiesProstateProstatic hyperplasiaThermal conductivity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.