Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28780553›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2017

A national surveillance project on chronic kidney disease management in Canadian primary care: a study protocol.

Aminu K Bello, Paul E Ronksley, Navdeep Tangri, Alexander Singer, Allan Grill, Dorothea Nitsch, John A Queenan, Cliff Lindeman, Boglarka Soos, Elizabeth Freiheit and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03689049 (SPIDER), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03689049 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

SPIDER: A Structured Process Informed by Data, Evidence and Research - A Research and Quality Improvement Collaboration Supporting Practices in Improving Care for Complex Elderly Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Toronto Practice Based Research NetworkRan2018 to 2027Enrolled104ConditionsPolypharmacy, Inappropriate Prescribing, Aged, Primary Health CareArmsSPIDER, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Aminu K BelloDivision of Nephrology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Paul E RonksleyDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Navdeep TangriDepartment of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Alexander SingerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Allan GrillDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dorothea NitschDepartment of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
John A QueenanDepartment of Family Medicine, Epidemiologist for the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network, Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Cliff LindemanDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Boglarka SoosDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Elizabeth FreiheitInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Delphine TuotDepartment of Medicine, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA.
Dee ManginDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Neil DrummondDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
University of Alberta · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CALondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMcMaster University · CAQueen's University · CAUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEffective chronic disease care is dependent on well-organised quality improvement (QI) strategies that monitor processes of care and outcomes for optimal care delivery. Although healthcare is provincially/territorially structured in Canada, there are national networks such as the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) as important facilitators for national QI-based studies to improve chronic disease care. The goal of our study is to improve the understanding of how patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are managed in primary care and the variation across practices and provinces and territories to drive improvements in care delivery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The CPCSSN database contains anonymised health information from the electronic medical records for patients of participating primary care practices (PCPs) across Canada (n=1200). The dataset includes information on patient sociodemographics, medications, laboratory results and comorbidities. Leveraging validated algorithms, case definitions and guidelines will help define CKD and the related processes of care, and these enable us to: (1) determine prevalent CKD burden; (2) ascertain the current practice pattern on risk identification and management of CKD and (3) study variation in care indicators (eg, achievement of blood pressure and proteinuria targets) and referral pattern for specialist kidney care. The process of care outcomes will be stratified across patients' demographics as well as provider and regional (provincial/territorial) characteristics. The prevalence of CKD stages 3-5 will be presented as age-sex standardised prevalence estimates stratified by province and as weighted averages for population rates with 95% CIs using census data. For each PCP, age-sex standardised prevalence will be calculated and compared with expected standardised prevalence estimates. The process-based outcomes will be defined using established methods. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The CPCSSN is committed to high ethical standards when dealing with individual data collected, and this work is reviewed and approved by the Network Scientific Committee. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant national and international scientific meetings.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareSentinel SurveillanceAlgorithmsCanadaEfficiency, OrganizationalElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrevalenceQuality ImprovementRenal Insufficiency, ChronicReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studieschronic renal failurenephrologyquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID28780553
PMCPMC5629677
OpenAlexW2742812628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.