Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28780504›Full record

Trial reportThorax2018

Intensive versus standard physical rehabilitation therapy in the critically ill (EPICC): a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial.

Stephen E Wright, Kirsty Thomas, Gillian Watson, Catherine Baker, Andrew Bryant, Thomas J Chadwick, Jing Shen, Ruth Wood, Jennifer Wilkinson, Leigh Mansfield and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Thorax, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 206 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen E WrightPerioperative and Critical Care Directorate, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Kirsty ThomasDepartment of Physiotherapy, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Gillian WatsonNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Catherine BakerDepartment of Physiotherapy, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Andrew BryantInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Thomas J ChadwickInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Jing ShenInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Ruth WoodNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Jennifer WilkinsonNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Leigh MansfieldDepartment of Physiotherapy, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Victoria StaffordDepartment of Physiotherapy, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Clare WadeDepartment of Physiotherapy, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Julie FurnevalDepartment of Anaesthetics, Sunderland Royal Hospital, City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK.
Andrea HendersonDepartment of Anaesthetics, James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.
Keith HugillDepartment of Anaesthetics, James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.
Philip HowardDepartment of Anaesthetics, James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.
Alistair RoyDepartment of Anaesthetics, Sunderland Royal Hospital, City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK.
Stephen BonnerDepartment of Anaesthetics, James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.
Simon BaudouinPerioperative and Critical Care Directorate, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBNewcastle University · GBSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBSunderland Royal Hospital · GBJames Cook University Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0909-20021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly physical rehabilitation in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been shown to improve short-term clinical outcomes but long-term benefit has not been proven and the optimum intensity of rehabilitation is not known.

methodsWe conducted a randomised, parallel-group, allocation-concealed, assessor-blinded, controlled trial in patients who had received at least 48 hours of invasive or non-invasive ventilation. Participants were randomised in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by admitting ICU, admission type and level of independence. The intervention group had a target of 90 min physical rehabilitation per day, the control group a target of 30 min per day (both Monday to Friday). The primary outcome was the Physical Component Summary (PCS) measure of SF-36 at 6 months.

resultsWe recruited 308 participants over 34 months: 150 assigned to the intervention and 158 to the control group. The intervention group received a median (IQR) of 161 (67-273) min of physical rehabilitation on ICU compared with 86 (31-139) min in the control group. At 6 months, 62 participants in the intervention group and 54 participants in the control group contributed primary outcome data. In the intervention group, 43 had died, 11 had withdrawn and 34 were lost to follow-up, while in the control group, 56 had died, 5 had withdrawn and 43 were lost to follow-up. There was no difference in the primary outcome at 6 months, mean (SD) PCS 37 (12.2) in the intervention group and 37 (11.3) in the control group.

conclusionsIn this study, ICU-based physical rehabilitation did not appear to improve physical outcomes at 6 months compared with standard physical rehabilitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 20436833.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAdultAgedCritical CareCritical IllnessExercise TherapyFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthQuality of LifeRespiration, ArtificialSurvival Ratecritical careearly mobilisationmechanical ventilationphysiotherapyrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID28780504
PMCPMC5870467
OpenAlexW2743219926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.