Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28779527›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2018

Ecological momentary analysis of the relations among stressful events, affective reactivity, and smoking among smokers with high versus low depressive symptoms during a quit attempt.

Haruka Minami, Brandon E Frank, Krysten W Bold, Danielle E McCarthy

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Impact of Coping With Stressful Events on Negative Affect and Cravings Among Smokers With Mood Disorders.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. A randomized controlled trial of distress tolerance treatment for smoking cessation.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2018
    Trial
  4. Affect and subjective cognitive functioning by depression symptom levels during naturalistic cigarette smoking in premenopausal females who smoke daily.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Decídetexto: Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Smoking Cessation Intervention in Puerto Rico.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haruka MinamiDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0169-0459
Brandon E FrankDepartment of Psychology, Fordham University, Bronx, NY, USA.
Krysten W BoldDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Danielle E McCarthyDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA.

Funding

Phenotypic Markers for Smoking Cessation: Impulsive Choice and Impulsive ActionRC1DA028129 · NIDA · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI MCCARTHY, DANIELLE ERIN · 2009 to 2010
$734k
NIDA NIH HHS RC1 DA028129
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo assess whether individuals trying to quit smoking who have high depressive symptoms (HD), compared with low depressive symptoms (LD): (1) report more frequent stressful events (SEs), (2) are more likely to smoke after SEs, (3) experience greater acute or persistent changes in affect after an SE, and (4) are at greater risk of smoking following affective changes.

designSmoking cessation data were analyzed using multi-level path modeling to examine the moderating effects of depressive symptoms on relations among SEs, subsequent affect, and smoking.

settingAn academic research center in Central New Jersey, USA.

participantsSeventy-one adult treatment-seeking daily smokers recruited from 2010 to 2012. MEASUREMENTS: Baseline depressive symptoms [HD: Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) ≥ 16 versus LD: CES-D < 16]; and real-time ecological momentary assessment (EMA) reports of SEs, affect, and smoking assessed during 21 days post-quit.

findingsMulti-level models indicated that HD smokers were more likely than LD smokers to report stressful events [odds ratio (OR) = 2.323, P = 0.009], but had similar post-stress acute affective changes (negative affect: b = -0.117, P = 0.137, positive affect: b = 0.020, P = 0.805). Only HD smokers reported increased negative affect (NA) (b = 0.199, P = 0.030) and decreased positive affect (PA) up to 12 hours later (b = -0.217, P = 0.021), and greater lapse risk up to 24 hours after an SE (OR = 3.213, P = 0.017). The persistence of elevated NA and suppressed PA was partially explained by increased odds of subsequent SEs among HD smokers. However, the heightened stress-lapse association over 24 hours found in HD smokers was not fully explained by sustained aversive affect or subsequent SEs.

conclusionsDepressed and non-depressed smokers trying to quit appear to experience similar acute affective changes following stress: however, depressed smokers experience higher rates of exposure to stress, longer-lasting post-stress affective disturbance and greater risk of smoking lapse 12-24 hours after a stressful event than non-depressed smokers.

Indexed as

AdultAffectComorbidityDepressive DisorderEcological Momentary AssessmentFemaleHumansMaleNew JerseySmokersSmokingSmoking CessationStress, PsychologicalDepressive symptomsecological momentary assessmentnegative affectpositive affectsmoking cessationstress reactivity

Identifiers

PMID28779527
PMCPMC5760357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.