Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28779443›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2017

New Developments in the Prophylactic Drug Treatment of Pediatric Migraine: What Is New in 2017 and Where Does It Leave Us?

Joanne Kacperski, Allyson Bazarsky

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joanne KacperskiDivision of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave-MLC 2015, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA. Joanne.Kacperski@cchmc.org.
Allyson BazarskyDivision of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave-MLC 2015, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA. Allyson.Bazarsky@cchmc.org.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewHeadaches in children are quite common; however, the study and characterization of headache disorders in the pediatric age group has historically been limited. Because of the lack of controlled studies on prophylactic treatment of headache disorders in this age group, the diagnosis of migraine rests on criteria similar those in adults. Likewise, data from adult studies is often inferred and applied to children. Although it appears that many preventives are safe in children, currently none are FDA or EMA approved for this age group. Consequently, many children who present to their primary care physicians with migraines do not receive any preventive therapy despite experiencing significant disability. RECENT

findingsControlled clinical trials investigating the use of preventive medications in children have suffered from high placebo response rates. The shorter duration of headaches and other characteristic features seen in children are such that designing randomized controlled trials in this age group is more problematic and limiting. Treatment practices vary widely, even among specialists, due to the absence of evidence-based guidelines from clinical trials. The Childhood and Adolescent Migraine Prevention Study (CHAMP) was developed to examine the effectiveness of two of the most widely prescribed preventive medications for pediatric migraine and help narrow this gap. To date, it has been the largest enrolling study of its kind within the pediatric migraine world; its results and implications will be discussed and considered here. The CHAMP trial was discontinued early on account of futility and exhibited that neither of two preventive medications for pediatric migraine was more effective than placebo in reducing the number of headache days over a period of 24 weeks. Subjects in the amitriptyline and topiramate groups had higher rates of adverse events than those who had received placebo.

Indexed as

AmitriptylineAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticChildControlled Clinical Trials as TopicFructoseHeadache DisordersHumansMigraine DisordersNeuroprotective AgentsTopiramateAmitriptylineAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticFructoseNeuroprotective AgentsTopiramateCHAMP: Childhood and adolescent migraine prevention studyMigraineNonpharmacologic treatmentPediatric migrainePreventive headache treatmentProphylactic headache treatment

Identifiers

PMID28779443
OpenAlexW2744524869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.