Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28779397›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2018

Comparison between MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography for differentiating malignant from benign mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.

Jiyoung Hwang, Young Kon Kim, Ji Hye Min, Woo Kyung Jeong, Seong Sook Hong, Hyun-Joo Kim

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07543263 (An Artificial Intelligence System for Multimodal, Multi-class Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Based on Endoscopic Ultrasonography), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07543263 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

An Artificial Intelligence System for Multimodal, Multi-class Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Based on Endoscopic Ultrasonography

TypeobservationalSponsorQilu Hospital of Shandong UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled176ConditionsPancreatic Cystic Lesion (PCL)ArmsiEUS-PCL(intelligent endoscopic ultrasound system- pancreatic cystic lesion)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CYSTIC PANCREATIC LESIONS: IMAGING VERSUS ANATOMOPATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS-HOW TO IMPROVE DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY?Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2023
    Article
  8. Clinical and Molecular Attributes and Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasm.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiyoung HwangDepartment of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young Kon KimDepartment of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. jmyr@dreamwiz.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3070-4880
Ji Hye MinDepartment of Radiology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Woo Kyung JeongDepartment of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seong Sook HongDepartment of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyun-Joo KimDepartment of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for differentiating malignant from benign intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) and mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) of the pancreas.

methodsThis retrospective study included 55 patients with 47 surgically confirmed IPMNs (12 malignant, 35 benign) and eight MCNs (two malignant, six benign) who underwent contrast-enhanced pancreas MRI and EUS. Contrast enhancement was not routinely used at EUS examination. Two observers independently evaluated the MRIs, and another reviewed EUS images. They recorded their confidence for malignancy with each imaging modality. We calculated diagnostic performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (A

resultsThe A

conclusionMRI showed better diagnostic performance than EUS for differentiating malignant from benign pancreatic IPMN and MCN. KEY POINTS: • The A

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, MucinousCholangiopancreatography, Magnetic ResonanceDiagnosis, DifferentialEndosonographyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPancreasPancreatic NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityEndoscopic ultrasonographyIntraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmMagnetic resonance imagingMucinous cystic neoplasmMural nodule

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.