Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28778992›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2017

The effect of different acute muscle contraction regimens on the expression of muscle proteolytic signaling proteins and genes.

Satoru Ato, Yuhei Makanae, Kohei Kido, Kohei Sase, Naomi Yoshii, Satoshi Fujita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Satoru AtoFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.
Yuhei MakanaeFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.
Kohei KidoFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.
Kohei SaseFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.
Naomi YoshiiFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.
Satoshi FujitaFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan safujita@fc.ritsumei.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2297-1647

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have reported that different modes of muscle contraction (i.e., eccentric or concentric contraction) with similar contraction times can affect muscle proteolytic responses. However, the effect of different contraction modes on muscle proteolytic response under the same force-time integral (FTI: contraction force × time) has not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different contraction modes, with the same FTI, on acute proteolytic signaling responses. Eleven-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to eccentric (EC), concentric (CC), or isometric contraction (IC) groups. Different modes of muscle contraction were performed on the right gastrocnemius muscle using electrical stimulation, with the left muscle acting as a control. In order to apply an equivalent FTI, the number of stimulation sets was modified between the groups. Muscle samples were taken immediately and three hours after exercise. Phosphorylation of FoxO3a at Ser253 was significantly increased immediately after exercise compared to controls irrespective of contraction mode. The mRNA levels of the ubiquitin ligases, MuRF1, and MAFbx mRNA were unchanged by contraction mode or time. Phosphorylation of ULK1 at Ser317 (positive regulatory site) and Ser757 (negative regulatory site) was significantly increased compared to controls, immediately or 3 h after exercise, in all contraction modes. The autophagy markers (LC3B-II/I ratio and p62 expression) were unchanged, regardless of contraction mode. These data suggest that differences in contraction mode during resistance exercise with a constant FTI, are not factors in regulating proteolytic signaling in the early phase of skeletal muscle contraction.

Indexed as

Muscle ContractionProteolysisSignal TransductionAnimalsAutophagy-Related Protein-1 HomologForkhead Box Protein O3MaleMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMuscle ProteinsMuscle, SkeletalPhysical Conditioning, AnimalRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySKP Cullin F-Box Protein LigasesTripartite Motif ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesAnxa3 protein, ratAutophagy-Related Protein-1 HomologFbxo32 protein, ratForkhead Box Protein O3FOXO3 protein, ratMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMuscle ProteinsSKP Cullin F-Box Protein LigasesTrim63 protein, ratTripartite Motif ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesULK1 protein, ratContraction modeproteolytic signalingresistance exercise

Identifiers

PMID28778992
PMCPMC5555890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.