Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28778733›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm2017

Left cervical vagal nerve stimulation reduces skin sympathetic nerve activity in patients with drug resistant epilepsy.

Yuan Yuan, Jonathan L Hassel, Anisiia Doytchinova, David Adams, Keith C Wright, Chad Meshberger, Lan S Chen, Maria P Guerra, Changyu Shen, Shien-Fong Lin and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Yuan YuanKrannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jonathan L HasselKrannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Anisiia DoytchinovaKrannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
David AdamsKrannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Keith C WrightKrannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Chad MeshbergerDepartment of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Lan S ChenDepartment of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Maria P GuerraKrannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Changyu ShenRichard and Susan Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Shien-Fong LinKrannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan.
Thomas H EverettKrannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Vicenta SalanovaKrannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Peng-Sheng ChenKrannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. Electronic address: chenpp@iu.edu.
Indiana University School of MedicineBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWXinHua Hospital · CN

Funding

WAVE DYNAMICS IN NORMAL AND DISEASED RABBIT HEARTSP01HL078931 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WEISS, JAMES · 2005 to 2015
$20.7M
Thoracic Veins and Sustained Atrial FibrillationR01HL071140 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHEN, PENG-SHENG · 2002 to 2014
$4.7M
Skin Sympathetic Nerve Activity and Cardiac ArrhythmiasR42DA043391 · NIDA · ARRHYTHMOTECH, LLC · PI EVERETT, THOMAS H · 2016 to 2017
$1.5M
Neuromodulation for Atrial Fibrillation ControlR56HL071140 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHEN, PENG-SHENG · 2016 to 2016
$461k
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL078931NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL071140NHLBI NIH HHS R56 HL071140NIDA NIH HHS R42 DA043391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe recently reported that skin sympathetic nerve activity (SKNA) can be used to estimate sympathetic tone in humans. In animal models, vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) can damage the stellate ganglion, reduce stellate ganglion nerve activity, and suppress cardiac arrhythmia. Whether VNS can suppress sympathetic tone in humans remains unclear.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that VNS suppresses SKNA in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

methodsECG patch electrodes were used to continuously record SKNA in 26 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who were admitted for video electroencephalographic monitoring. Among them, 6 (2 men, age 40 ± 11 years) were previously treated with VNS and 20 (7 men, age 37 ± 8 years) were not. The signals from ECG leads I and II were filtered to detect SKNA.

resultsVNS had an on-time of 30 seconds and off-time of 158 ± 72 seconds, with output of 1.92 ± 0.42 mA at 24.17 ± 2.01 Hz. Average SKNA during VNS off-time was 1.06 μV (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-1.18) in lead I and 1.13 μV (95% CI 0.99-1.27) in lead II, which was significantly lower than 1.38 μV (95% CI 1.01-1.75; P = .036) and 1.38 μV (95% CI 0.98-1.78; P = .035) in the control group, respectively. Heart rate was 65 bpm (95% CI 59-71) in the VNS group, which was significantly lower than 77 bpm (95% CI 71-83) in the control group.

conclusionPatients with VNS had significantly lower SKNA than those without VNS.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedDeath, Sudden, CardiacDrug Resistant EpilepsyElectrocardiographyFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicSkinStellate GanglionVagus NerveVagus Nerve StimulationAutonomic nervous systemNeuromodulationSudden unexpected death in epilepsy

Identifiers

PMID28778733
PMCPMC5712260
OpenAlexW2740086036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.