ArticleMedical engineering & physics2017
Image-based immersed boundary model of the aortic root.
Article in Medical engineering & physics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Whole-Heart Fluid-Structure Interaction Model for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in Primary Mitral Regurgitation.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- A Parametric Finite Element Analysis of Chick Embryo Aortic Valve Leaflet Biomechanics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Composite B-spline regularized delta functions for the immersed boundary method: Divergence-free interpolation and gradient-preserving force spreading.Journal of computational physics · 2026Article
- LOCAL DIVERGENCE-FREE IMMERSED FINITE ELEMENT-DIFFERENCE METHOD USING COMPOSITE B-SPLINES.Advances in computational science and engineering · 2025Article
- Simulating cardiac fluid dynamics in the human heart.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Benchmarking the Immersed Boundary Method for Viscoelastic Flows.Journal of computational physics · 2024Article
- Semi-Automated Construction of Patient-Specific Aortic Valves from Computed Tomography Images.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- On the Lagrangian-Eulerian Coupling in the Immersed Finite Element/Difference Method.Journal of computational physics · 2022Article
- Computational Modeling of Right Ventricular Motion and Intracardiac Flow in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2022Article
- A design-based model of the aortic valve for fluid-structure interaction.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2021Article
- The Comparison of Different Constitutive Laws and Fiber Architectures for the Aortic Valve on Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulation.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Fluid-Structure Interaction Models of Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Dynamics in an Experimental Pulse Duplicator.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2020Article
- An Immersed Interface Method for Discrete Surfaces.Journal of computational physics · 2020Article
- Hybrid finite difference/finite element immersed boundary method.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2017Article
- Computational methods for the aortic heart valve and its replacements.Expert review of medical devices · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Each year, approximately 300,000 heart valve repair or replacement procedures are performed worldwide, including approximately 70,000 aortic valve replacement surgeries in the United States alone. Computational platforms for simulating cardiovascular devices such as prosthetic heart valves promise to improve device design and assist in treatment planning, including patient-specific device selection. This paper describes progress in constructing anatomically and physiologically realistic immersed boundary (IB) models of the dynamics of the aortic root and ascending aorta. This work builds on earlier IB models of fluid-structure interaction (FSI) in the aortic root, which previously achieved realistic hemodynamics over multiple cardiac cycles, but which also were limited to simplified aortic geometries and idealized descriptions of the biomechanics of the aortic valve cusps. By contrast, the model described herein uses an anatomical geometry reconstructed from patient-specific computed tomography angiography (CTA) data, and employs a description of the elasticity of the aortic valve leaflets based on a fiber-reinforced constitutive model fit to experimental tensile test data. The resulting model generates physiological pressures in both systole and diastole, and yields realistic cardiac output and stroke volume at physiological Reynolds numbers. Contact between the valve leaflets during diastole is handled automatically by the IB method, yielding a fully competent valve model that supports a physiological diastolic pressure load without regurgitation. Numerical tests show that the model is able to resolve the leaflet biomechanics in diastole and early systole at practical grid spacings. The model is also used to examine differences in the mechanics and fluid dynamics yielded by fresh valve leaflets and glutaraldehyde-fixed leaflets similar to those used in bioprosthetic heart valves. Although there are large differences in the leaflet deformations during diastole, the differences in the open configurations of the valve models are relatively small, and nearly identical hemodynamics are obtained in all cases considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.