Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28778208›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2017

Assessing service use for mental health by Indigenous populations in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States of America: a rapid review of population surveys.

Cecily McIntyre, Meredith G Harris, Amanda J Baxter, Stuart Leske, Sandra Diminic, Joseph P Gone, Ernest Hunter, Harvey Whiteford

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Nii Kandis (Knowing Myself): Finding a Sacred Home at Anishnawbe Health Toronto Through Spirit-Based Healing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Multi-ethnic validation of 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale in Chile.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Cecily McIntyreSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Meredith G HarrisSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia. meredith_harris@qcmhr.uq.edu.au.
Amanda J BaxterSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Stuart LeskeSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Sandra DiminicSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Joseph P GoneDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
Ernest HunterRemote Area Mental Health Service, Queensland Health, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.
Harvey WhitefordSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research · AUUniversity of Queensland · AUPark Centre for Mental Health · AUQueensland Health · AUUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndigenous people in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States of America experience disproportionately poor mental health compared to their non-Indigenous counterparts. To optimally allocate resources, health planners require information about the services Indigenous people use for mental health, their unmet treatment needs and the barriers to care. We reviewed population surveys of Indigenous people to determine whether the information needed to guide service development is being collected.

methodsWe sought national- or state-level epidemiological surveys of Indigenous populations conducted in each of the four selected countries since 1990 that asked about service use for mental health. Surveys were identified from literature reviews and web searches. We developed a framework for categorising the content of each survey. Using this framework, we compared the service use content of the surveys of Indigenous people to each other and to general population mental health surveys. We focused on identifying gaps in information coverage and topics that may require Indigenous-specific questions or response options.

resultsNine surveys met our inclusion criteria. More than half of these included questions about health professionals consulted, barriers to care, perceived need for care, medications taken, number, duration, location and payment of health professional visits or use of support services or self-management. Less than half included questions about interventions received, hospital admissions or treatment dropout. Indigenous-specific content was most common in questions regarding use of support services or self-management, types of health professionals consulted, barriers to care and interventions received.

conclusionsEpidemiological surveys measuring service use for mental health among Indigenous populations have been less comprehensive and less standardised than surveys of the general population, despite having assessed similar content. To better understand the gaps in mental health service systems for Indigenous people, systematically-collected subjective and objective indicators of the quality of care being delivered are needed.

Indexed as

AustraliaCanadaCulturally Competent CareHumansMental HealthMental Health ServicesNew ZealandPopulation GroupsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesIndigenousMental disordersMental health servicesSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID28778208
PMCPMC5544983
OpenAlexW2743631323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.